Originally posted by sonhouse You really expect anyone to watch an hour and a half video of opinions?
I only expect those that might be interested enough to watch. I mainly referenced it to let everyone know that there has been a lot of archaeological evidence found to support claims of biblical historical accuracy.
Originally posted by RJHinds I only expect those that might be interested enough to watch. I mainly referenced it to let everyone know that there has been a lot of archaeological evidence found to support claims of biblical historical accuracy.
A lot of refuted evidence, you mean. These dudes don't publish so you just get opinions and outright lies in their zeal to prove the world is only 6K years old.
Originally posted by RJHinds I mainly referenced it to let everyone know that there has been a lot of archaeological evidence found to support claims of biblical historical accuracy.
Originally posted by sonhouse Yeah, it should be 'hysterical accuracy of the bible'.
The Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo are the best historical evidence for the accuracy of the biblical crucifixion and resurrection of Christ Jesus.
Originally posted by RJHinds The Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo are the best historical evidence for the accuracy of the biblical crucifixion and resurrection of Christ Jesus.