1. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Jan '14 01:22
    This is six months old, but it's 3 degrees outside, and I'm a little bored. Still more hypocrisy from the Left: remember when Obama slammed Romney for obeying the law and paying a 15% capital gains rate? As it would turn out:



    Obama's tax rate is 18.4 percent. Is that too low for a millionaire?

    The release of President Obama's tax returns last week showed that his tax rate has gone down. Of course, his income went down and he gave a lot to charity, but critics are still chirping.


    President Obama walks out from the White House before leaving to play basketball at the FBI building in Washington Sunday.
    (Yuri Gripas/Reuters)
    By Husna Haq, Correspondent
    posted April 15, 2013 at 1:16 pm EDT

    Has President Obama been taking advice from Mitt Romney’s tax accountant?

    Months after attacking Mr. Romney for his low tax rate, some critics are now turning the tables on the president, saying his 2012 tax rate is too low.

    The president paid $112,214 in federal income taxes on an adjusted gross income of $608,611 in 2012, making his effective federal tax rate 18.4 percent. (The Obamas also paid $29,450 in Illinois income tax.)

    Apparently, that’s a lot less than some folks at MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” pay.

    “The president was talking about how shameful it is that Mitt Romney paid less in taxes than teachers paid in taxes, and yet Barack Obama, reportedly worth $14 million, paid less in taxes than teachers or Warren Buffet’s poor, overworked secretary,” “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough said on Monday's show.

    Is Obama’s tax rate too low?

    Want your top political issues explained? Get customized DC Decoder updates.

    Well, for starters, it’s still higher than Romney’s 2011 rate of 14.1 percent – though that’s not saying much.

    It’s also higher than US taxpayers’ average income tax rate of about 11.8 percent in 2011, according to the Tax Foundation, a tax research group in Washington. And it’s higher than the rate some 46 percent of Americans, mostly poor or elderly, pay – that is, no federal income taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center, a tax think tank.

    Then again, Mr. Obama is not your average taxpayer, nor is he poor or elderly (though those gray hairs may fool you).

    In fact, the Obamas’ 2012 tax rate is 2 percentage points lower than last year’s, when their rate was 20.5 percent.

    There are a few reasons for this. Most obviously, the Obamas made less money in 2012 than they did the previous year – $608,611 in 2012 compared with $789,674 in 2011. That’s largely due to a drop in sales of the president’s two bestsellers, “Dreams From My Father,” and “The Audacity of Hope,” both of which made Obama a millionaire. (Both years Obama made $400,000 from his presidential salary.)

    And as the White House likes to point out, they also donated almost a quarter of their income, some $150,034, to 33 different charities, lowering their tax rate.

    Nonetheless, almost all of the Obamas’ income was subject to the top tax rate of 39.6 percent in 2012, according to Reuters.

    Still, even the president himself appears to think his tax rate is too low, and he’s using his own tax return to promote the Buffett Rule, a minimum tax rate for the wealthy.

    The White House’s 2014 budget proposal includes a proposed Buffett Rule, named for billionaire investor Warren Buffett, who has publicly complained that his tax rate is lower than that of his secretary.

    "The president believes we must reform our tax system which is why he has proposed policies like the Buffett Rule that would ask the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share while protecting families making under $250,000 from seeing their taxes go up," White House press secretary Jay Carney said in a blog post. "Under the President’s own tax proposals … he would pay more in taxes while ensuring we cut taxes for the middle class and those trying to get in it."

    If it’s an effort to make those who shoveled vast swaths of their paychecks to Uncle Sam feel better on this most grim of Mondays (à la Obama’s plan to give back 5 percent of his pay in solidarity with government workers affected by the sequester), it’s probably not working.
  2. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Jan '14 03:06
    Originally posted by sasquatch672
    This is six months old, but it's 3 degrees outside, and I'm a little bored. Still more hypocrisy from the Left: remember when Obama slammed Romney for obeying the law and paying a 15% capital gains rate? As it would turn out:



    Obama's tax rate is 18.4 percent. Is that too low for a millionaire?

    The release of President Obama's tax returns la ...[text shortened]... pay in solidarity with government workers affected by the sequester), it’s probably not working.
    So Obama made 1/30 of what Romney made and actually had a job yet paid a higher percentage of his income to federal taxes.

    Yeah, that's an outrage.
  3. Joined
    22 Jun '08
    Moves
    8801
    08 Jan '14 03:21
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    So Obama made 1/30 of what Romney made and actually had a job yet paid a higher percentage of his income to federal taxes.

    Yeah, that's an outrage.
    Obama has a job?,, could have fooled me,, what is his job description? Provide shovel ready jobs? Start an economic council, attend one meeting then disband it?
    Lol,, I don't think he'll make the cut at golf or BB.. I think he should have kept his license to practice law updated..
  4. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Jan '14 13:051 edit
    Originally posted by Hugh Glass
    Obama has a job?,, could have fooled me,, what is his job description? Provide shovel ready jobs? Start an economic council, attend one meeting then disband it?
    Lol,, I don't think he'll make the cut at golf or BB.. I think he should have kept his license to practice law updated..
    His employers were satisfied enough with him to renew his contract for another 4 years.
  5. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    08 Jan '14 13:23
    Originally posted by sasquatch672

    Is Obama’s tax rate too low?
    Absolutely. But how does that make Obama a hypocrite?
  6. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Jan '14 16:20
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    Absolutely. But how does that make Obama a hypocrite?
    Because he pilloried Mitt Romney for paying 15%.
  7. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    08 Jan '14 16:39
    Originally posted by Hugh Glass
    Obama has a job?,, could have fooled me,, what is his job description? Provide shovel ready jobs? Start an economic council, attend one meeting then disband it?
    Lol,, I don't think he'll make the cut at golf or BB.. I think he should have kept his license to practice law updated..
    He said that Obama had a job, not that he actually does a good job.

    Any moron can see that Obama is an incompetent boob, but it takes a special moron to think that Obama isn't.
  8. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    08 Jan '14 17:29
    Originally posted by sasquatch672
    Because he pilloried Mitt Romney for paying 15%.
    My memory may be failing me, but I thought that discussion was not about Mitt Romney evading taxes, but about the tax code being written in such a way that people like Mitt Romney pay very low taxes. I seem to recall that it was claimed that the law should be rewritten in such a way that people like Mitt Romney pay more taxes, not that Mitt Romney should pay more taxes than he must by law. Can you cite Obama saying that Mitt Romney should voluntarily contribute more to the Treasury?
  9. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Jan '14 17:35
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    My memory may be failing me, but I thought that discussion was not about Mitt Romney evading taxes, but about the tax code being written in such a way that people like Mitt Romney pay very low taxes. I seem to recall that it was claimed that the law should be rewritten in such a way that people like Mitt Romney pay more taxes, not that Mitt Romney shoul ...[text shortened]... . Can you cite Obama saying that Mitt Romney should voluntarily contribute more to the Treasury?
    Actually if the Republican tax proposals in their platform were ever enacted, Romney would pay close to nothing in taxes: the GOP wants to abolish all taxes on capital gains and dividends and Romney makes virtually all his money from the former.
  10. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    08 Jan '14 17:37
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    His employers were satisfied enough with him to renew his contract for another 4 years.
    Interesting to note that Presidents, all of them, don't have a lot of expenses. Their salary, and outside investment income is rarely ever touched. Unless he does a "Bill Clinton" and sneaks out for a hooker and hamburger, the President doesn't spend money on anything.
  11. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    08 Jan '14 17:46
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Actually if the Republican tax proposals in their platform were ever enacted, Romney would pay close to nothing in taxes: the GOP wants to abolish all taxes on capital gains and dividends and Romney makes virtually all his money from the former.
    Actually, in the past I've argued legitimacy of lower capital gains and dividend income rates. My opinion was changed by arguments in Peter Sweitzer's book Extortion. The truth is that major corporations can pay in a multitude of ways which result in tax avoidance, and different rates just encourage that manipulation.

    Lower, flatter rates, and no exemptions or other loopholes encourage greater compliance. That should include people of all income status, so that Americans aren't played against one another, as Marx did in his manifesto.
  12. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Jan '14 19:00
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Actually, in the past I've argued legitimacy of lower capital gains and dividend income rates. My opinion was changed by arguments in Peter Sweitzer's book Extortion. The truth is that major corporations can pay in a multitude of ways which result in tax avoidance, and different rates just encourage that manipulation.

    Lower, flatter rates, and no exe ...[text shortened]... ncome status, so that Americans aren't played against one another, as Marx did in his manifesto.
    Yes prior to Marx all the classes got along just fine and cooperated in the spirit of solidarity and brotherhood.
  13. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Jan '14 20:08
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    My memory may be failing me, but I thought that discussion was not about Mitt Romney evading taxes, but about the tax code being written in such a way that people like Mitt Romney pay very low taxes. I seem to recall that it was claimed that the law should be rewritten in such a way that people like Mitt Romney pay more taxes, not that Mitt Romney shoul ...[text shortened]... . Can you cite Obama saying that Mitt Romney should voluntarily contribute more to the Treasury?
    Why do you sound so reasonable this week?

    You're correct - the argument was over the rate that Romney paid; I never suggested otherwise. But the bee in my bonnet on this particular day is Obama has said, so many times, that "the rich should pay their fair share". Well, Obama's rich, and according to him, he's now not paying his fair share. It's just more hypocrisy from him. His stench - I can't bear it.
  14. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Jan '14 22:17
    Originally posted by sasquatch672
    Why do you sound so reasonable this week?

    You're correct - the argument was over the rate that Romney paid; I never suggested otherwise. But the bee in my bonnet on this particular day is Obama has said, so many times, that "the rich should pay their fair share". Well, Obama's rich, and according to him, he's now not paying his fair share. It's just more hypocrisy from him. His stench - I can't bear it.
    How is it "hypocrisy"? He, unlike Romney, has made proposals that would have increased taxes on individuals and families with incomes at his levels.
  15. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2701
    08 Jan '14 22:27
    Originally posted by sasquatch672
    Why do you sound so reasonable this week?

    You're correct - the argument was over the rate that Romney paid; I never suggested otherwise. But the bee in my bonnet on this particular day is Obama has said...
    You have so many bees in your bonnet your hair must look like Marge Simpson's.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree