1. Standard membertalzamir
    Art, not a Toil
    60.13N / 25.01E
    Joined
    19 Sep '11
    Moves
    56897
    10 Mar '14 20:17
    This is trivial enough, but I'll probably use it in a high school someday.

    A rectangle has circumference length of p. The diagonal has length d. What is the area of the rectangle?
  2. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    11 Mar '14 21:233 edits
    Originally posted by talzamir
    This is trivial enough, but I'll probably use it in a high school someday.

    A rectangle has circumference length of p. The diagonal has length d. What is the area of the rectangle?
    I don't know if I did this the hard way, because it didn't seem obvious to me...

    Let the sides of the rectangle be x, and y respectively.

    Perimeter = P = 2*x + 2*y ....eq (1)

    from the Pythagorean theorem

    d² = x² + y² ...eq(2)

    from eq(1)

    y = 1/2*P - x ...eq(1)'

    from eq(2)

    y = Sqrt ( d² - x² )

    Set eq(1)' = eq(2)

    1/2*P - x = Sqrt ( d² - x² )

    solve for x in terms of d, and P by completing the square

    x = Sqrt(d²/2 - 1/16*P² ) + P/4 ...eq(3)

    Sub eq(3) into eq(1)'

    y = 1/2*P - [Sqrt(d²/2 - 1/16*P² ) + P/4]

    = 1/4*P - Sqrt(d²/2 - 1/16*P² )

    then Area = A = x*y

    = (P/4 + Sqrt(d²/2 - 1/16*P² ))(P/4 - Sqrt(d²/2 - 1/16*P² ))

    which is of the form (a + b)(a - b) = a² - b² : giving after simplification

    A = P²/8 - d²/2 ***
  3. Joined
    21 Sep '05
    Moves
    75006
    11 Mar '14 22:462 edits
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    Let the sides of the rectangle be x, and y respectively.

    Perimeter = P = 2*x + 2*y ....eq (1)

    from the Pythagorean theorem

    d² = x² + y² ...eq(2)
    What you did works well.

    Starting with what I have quoted above there is a neat trick which avoids needing to complete the square.

    If you square both sides of eq(1) you get something that involves a multiple of x² + y² (which is d² ) and a multiple of xy (which is the area we want).

    Then rearrange to get your result.
  4. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    11 Mar '14 23:14
    Originally posted by Diapason
    What you did works well.

    Starting with what I have quoted above there is a neat trick which avoids needing to complete the square.

    If you square both sides of eq(1) you get something that involves a multiple of x² + y² (which is d² ) and a multiple of xy (which is the area we want).

    Then rearrange to get your result.
    Wish I would have saw that,...by far less work!
  5. Standard membertalzamir
    Art, not a Toil
    60.13N / 25.01E
    Joined
    19 Sep '11
    Moves
    56897
    12 Mar '14 07:33
    Nicely done. And the squaring trick is what I was thinking too. ๐Ÿ™‚

    2x + 2y = p => x + y = p/2 => x^2 + 2xy + y^2 = p^2/4

    x^2 + y^2 = d^2

    combine for p^2/4 + 2xy = d^2 => xy = d^2/2 - p^2/8 = A
  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    21 Mar '14 11:422 edits
    Originally posted by talzamir
    Nicely done. And the squaring trick is what I was thinking too. ๐Ÿ™‚

    2x + 2y = p => x + y = p/2 => x^2 + 2xy + y^2 = p^2/4

    x^2 + y^2 = d^2

    combine for p^2/4 + 2xy = d^2 => xy = d^2/2 - p^2/8 = A
    It's funny, the first numbers I chose showed me something about rectangles:

    I chose d=10 and p=20 where A = zero๐Ÿ™‚

    which makes sense๐Ÿ™‚

    It also means you can get negative numbers: D=10 and P=22, A = minus 60.5)

    How can you fix it so that doesn't happen?

    Exploding ink?๐Ÿ™‚
  7. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    21 Mar '14 22:121 edit
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    It's funny, the first numbers I chose showed me something about rectangles:

    I chose d=10 and p=20 where A = zero๐Ÿ™‚

    which makes sense๐Ÿ™‚

    It also means you can get negative numbers: D=10 and P=22, A = minus 60.5)

    How can you fix it so that doesn't happen?

    Exploding ink?๐Ÿ™‚
    You happened to pick your variables outside of the domain of the equation.

    In order for the equation to give valid results ( that is results that are physical ) the area of the rectangle must be strictly greater than zero. For if it were equal to zero, you don't have a rectangle.

    So;

    A > 0

    P²/8 - d²/2 > 0

    P²/8 > d²/2

    P² > 4*d²

    P > 2*d (this is the domain of the equation), which say that all perimeters must be greater than twice the diagonal.

    You picked a perimeter that was exactly equal to twice the diagonal, which is out of the equations domain. See?
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    22 Mar '14 01:29
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    You happened to pick your variables outside of the domain of the equation.

    In order for the equation to give valid results ( that is results that are physical ) the area of the rectangle must be strictly greater than zero. For if it were equal to zero, you don't have a rectangle.

    So;

    A > 0

    P²/8 - d²/2 > 0

    P²/8 > d²/2

    P² > 4*d²

    P > 2*d ...[text shortened]... imeter that was exactly equal to twice the diagonal, which is out of the equations domain. See?
    I knew that, just pulling your chain๐Ÿ™‚
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree