1. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    26 Oct '14 23:49
    He was good at what he did. He knew politics well and I thought he was better than than Chuck Todd or Tim Russert.

    Why?
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    27 Oct '14 04:00
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    He was good at what he did. He knew politics well and I thought he was better than than Chuck Todd or Tim Russert.

    Why?
    Ratings, I suppose.

    http://pagesix.com/2014/08/16/david-gregory-was-paid-4m-to-leave-nbc/
  3. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    27 Oct '14 11:21
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Ratings, I suppose.

    http://pagesix.com/2014/08/16/david-gregory-was-paid-4m-to-leave-nbc/
    Is Chuck Todd bringing better ratings?
  4. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    27 Oct '14 14:54
    The Empire didn't like him.
  5. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    27 Oct '14 17:101 edit
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Is Chuck Todd bringing better ratings?
    Initially, the ratings went up. It is up one week and down the next. So it may be too early to tell at this point. It may have more to do with who is being interviewed than the host. Who knows?
  6. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    28 Oct '14 00:361 edit
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    He was good at what he did. He knew politics well and I thought he was better than than Chuck Todd or Tim Russert.

    Why?
    I didn't like him because he was a leftist stooge. I thought Tim Russert had his own opinions and didn't simply have his lips surgically connected to the DNC's arse.

    The new guy is even worse than David Gregory.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree