Discovered: the great stone

DISCOVERED: The GREAT STONE Owned By Joseph of Arimathaea from the Garden Tomb.

YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
DISCOVERED: The GREAT STONE Owned By Joseph of Arimathaea from the Garden Tomb.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8BqARq0pXw

Somebody should edit out the re-enactments and just
use the "documentary". I wonder what genius decided
on using a Cockney girl with a lisp for the narration?
Hilarious. Sounds like she is reading a fairy tale to little
children.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Somebody should edit out the re-enactments and just
use the "documentary". I wonder what genius decided
on using a Cockney girl with a lisp for the narration?
Hilarious. Sounds like she is reading a fairy tale to little
children.

Perhaps you would prefer this narrator better. However they still use re-enactments and it is much longer.

DISCOVERED: The True Tomb of Jesus & The GREAT Stone to The Tomb.

YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
DISCOVERED: The GREAT STONE Owned By Joseph of Arimathaea from the Garden Tomb.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8BqARq0pXw

bwahahahahaha

Originally posted by RJHinds
DISCOVERED: The GREAT STONE Owned By Joseph of Arimathaea from the Garden Tomb.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8BqARq0pXw

If proof existed, faith would not be required. Do you believe that faith is not required? Is not, why do you keep looking for proof?

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
If proof existed, faith would not be required. Do you believe that faith is not required? Is not, why do you keep looking for proof?

Any proof will still require faith for one to believe the proof. What I consider proof may not be proof for you if you don't have faith to believe it.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Any proof will still require faith for one to believe the proof. What I consider proof may not be proof for you if you don't have faith to believe it.

If your proof requires faith to accept it then it is, by definition, not proof.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Any proof will still require faith for one to believe the proof. What I consider proof may not be proof for you if you don't have faith to believe it.

And yet, if one has faith, is proof required?

Originally posted by googlefudge
If your proof requires faith to accept it then it is, by definition, not proof.

proof

noun

1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.

2. anything serving as such evidence:
What proof do you have?

3. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial:
to put a thing to the proof.

4. the establishment of the truth of anything; demonstration.

5. Law. (in judicial proceedings) evidence having probative weight.

6. the effect of evidence in convincing the mind.

7. an arithmetical operation serving to check the correctness of a calculation.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/proof

Which definition of proof are you referring to?

Originally posted by googlefudge
If your proof requires faith to accept it then it is, by definition, not proof.

And if one's faith requires proof to accept it then it is, by definition, not faith.

(I know you knew that, I was just providing equal time for opposing views. 🙂 More for RJH than for you, of course.)

Originally posted by Suzianne
And if one's faith requires proof to accept it then it is, by definition, not faith.

(I know you knew that, I was just providing equal time for opposing views. 🙂 More for RJH than for you, of course.)

To these He also presented Himself alive after His suffering, by many convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of forty days and speaking of the things concerning the kingdom of God.

(Acts 1:3 NASB)

Having proofs of something does not mean we do not also need faith to believe.

Originally posted by RJHinds

To these He also presented Himself alive after His suffering, by many convincing [b]proofs, appearing to them over a period of forty days and speaking of the things concerning the kingdom of God.

(Acts 1:3 NASB)

Having proofs of something does not mean we do not also need faith to believe.[/b]

Come again?

How can we have "proof" that something exists and yet it still require that we have faith that it exists?

Originally posted by divegeester
Come again?

How can we have "proof" that something exists and yet it still require that we have faith that it exists?

How can you understand without intelligence? 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
How can you understand without intelligence? 😏

I'm sorry what do you mean? How does this comment relate to my question which is: If we have PROOF that something exists, then why would we still require FAITH to hope that it exists?

Originally posted by divegeester
I'm sorry what do you mean? How does this comment relate to my question which is: If we have PROOF that something exists, then why would we still require FAITH to hope that it exists?

😴