Ask any scientist where life on our planet came from, and they'll usually give you a one-word answer: "Evolution." Immediately thereafter, they will usually give you a condescending look that also implies you're an idiot for not knowing this "scientific fact" that everyone else has accepted as true.
It turns out, however, that the scientist is suffering from a delusion. Evolution doesn't even encompass origins of life. Rather, evolution (i.e. natural selection) explains a process by which species undergo a process of adaptation, fitness and reproduction in response to environmental, behavioral and sexual influences. No rational person can deny that natural selection is ever-present and happening right now across bacteria, plants, animals and even humans, yet natural selection can only function on pre-existing life forms. It does not give rise to non-existent life.
Evolution as a theory of the origin of life is a FAITH, not science.
Abiogenesis as a theory of the origin of life is MAGIC, not science.
Conventional scientists, of course, will go through tremendous contortions to try to remove any idea of a designer, engineer or Creator from their worldview. That's because nearly all of them are devout atheists who also disavow any belief in consciousness, free will, the soul, God or spirituality. According to their own explanations, they themselves are mindless biological robots suffering from the mere delusion of mind created as a kind of artificial projection of mechanistic biological brain function.
Their faith-based beliefs are always described as "facts" while they proclaim other people's beliefs are delusions and fairy tales.
When scientists talk about evolution, they do so from an all-encompassing arrogance that assumes they are correct by default. Anyone daring to debate with them must prove they are wrong, yet they themselves have no obligation to prove they are right. The faith of Scientism requires no proof, only faith. It is assumed correct as a key principle of the religion of Scientism.
Most conventional scientists claim that consciousness is an illusion which somehow arose out of natural selection so that individual members of a species could operate under the illusion of free will. Yet, at the same time, they claim this false "mind" has no actual impact on the real world because it is, by definition, an illusion.
In truth, many so-called scientific "facts" all boil down to "beliefs."
Originally posted by RJHinds [b]Theory of evolution Contradictions [quote]Ask any scientist where life on our planet came from, and they'll usually give you a one-word answer: "Evolution." Immediately thereafter, they will usually give you a condescending look that also implies you're an idiot for not knowing this "scientific fact" that everyone else has accepted as true.
It tur ...[text shortened]... e]
http://www.naturalnews.com/042613_Theory_of_Evolution_contradictions_scientific_thinking.htm[/b]
"Ask any scientist where life on our planet came from, and they'll usually give you a one-"word answer: "Evolution.""
no they won't. evolution has nothing to do with how life originated. every scientist knows that. you should too, since we repeated again and again that it doesn't.
Originally posted by RJHinds Ask any scientist where life on our planet came from, and they'll usually give you a one-word answer: "Evolution." [...] It turns out, however, that the scientist is suffering from a delusion. Evolution doesn't even encompass origins of life.
Originally posted by RJHinds [b]Theory of evolution Contradictions [quote]Ask any scientist where life on our planet came from, and they'll usually give you a one-word answer: "Evolution." Immediately thereafter, they will usually give you a condescending look that also implies you're an idiot for not knowing this "scientific fact" that everyone else has accepted as true.
It tur ...[text shortened]... e]
http://www.naturalnews.com/042613_Theory_of_Evolution_contradictions_scientific_thinking.htm[/b]
Abiogenesis as a theory of the origin of life is FAITH and MAGIC, not science. Many so-called scientific "facts" by evolutionists are BELIEFS.
Originally posted by C Hess Shouldn't they be called abiogenesists? And then there are the big bangists (they're the fun ones). And, of course, the ever so attractive gravitists.
No. They should be called evolutionists.
Evolutionist - One who argues that evolution is the correct theory of origins for life on earth (instead of creationism or Intelligent Design).
Originally posted by RJHinds You give no reference. 😏
You are being deliberately obtuse. The question of where life came from has NOTHING to do with evolution which we have pointed out time and time again and you knew good and well what he meant by 'nope'.
The science of life origins always was and always will be a separate science from evolution as we have said many times but your thick skull refuses to take that as an answer, instead always linking the origin of life with evolution.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME SUBJECT so why do you continue to act in such a blatantly stupid manner?
Originally posted by sonhouse You are being deliberately obtuse. The question of where life came from has NOTHING to do with evolution which we have pointed out time and time again and you knew good and well what he meant by 'nope'.
The science of life origins always was and always will be a separate science from evolution as we have said many times but your thick skull refuses to t ...[text shortened]...
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME SUBJECT so why do you continue to act in such a blatantly stupid manner?
However, evolution requires life. So you can not have evolution without life.
Originally posted by googlefudge Yes, we know, that's what we keep telling you.
EDIT: Actually what it requires is self replication with modification... but for you, that's close enough.
No, it requires life with the DNA information code already there so it can naturally select from what is already there. Evolution is not a mechanism for creating new information and is therefore not a creative force able to cause anything to evolve.
Originally posted by RJHinds No, it requires life with the DNA information code already there so it can naturally select from what is already there. Evolution is not a mechanism for creating new information and is therefore not a creative force able to cause anything to evolve.
Wrong.
It doesn't require DNA, it can 'create information', and you are well aware of this
because you have been told literally thousands of times over the years.
It doesn't require DNA, it can 'create information', and you are well aware of this
because you have been told literally thousands of times over the years.
You are thus lying through your teeth.
Being told something and being shown proof are not the same thing, as you are well aware. 😏
Theory of evolution Contradictions
29 May '15 07:181 edit
YouTube
Back to Top