For all those who believe in evolution, I think it is important to examine the founder of the theory of evolution. Maybe it is out of ignorance that you still believe his theory, or maybe you don't know who he was, so I'll try introduce him to you:

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) was born into wealth and able to have a life of ease. He took two years of medical school at Edinburgh University, and then dropped out. It was the only scientific training he ever received. Because he spent the time in the bars with his friends, he barely passed his courses. Darwin had no particular purpose in life, and his father planned to get him into a nicely paid job as an Anglican minister. Darwin did not object.

But an influential relative got him a position as unpaid "naturalist" on a ship planning to sail around the world, the Beagle. The voyage lasted from December 1831 to October 1836.

It is of interest that, after engaging in spiritism, certain men in history have been seized with a deep hatred of God and have then been guided to devise evil teachings, that have destroyed large numbers of people, while others have engaged in warfare which have annihilated millions. In connection with this, think of such known spiritists as Sigmund Freud and Adolf Hitler. It is not commonly known that Charles Darwin, while a naturalist aboard the Beagle, was initiated into witchcraft in South America by nationals. During horseback travels into the interior, he took part in their ceremonies and, as a result, something happened to him. Upon his return to England, although his health was strangely weakened, he spent the rest of his life working on theories to destroy faith in the Creator.

After leaving South America, Darwin was on the Galapagos Islands for a few days. While there, he saw some finches, which had blown in from South America and adapted to their environment, producing several sub-species. He was certain that this showed cross-species evolution (change into new species). But they were still finches. This theory about the finches was the primary evidence of evolution he brought back with him to England.

Darwin, never a scientist and knowing nothing about the practicalities of genetics, then married his first cousin, which resulted in all seven of his children having physical or mental disorders. (One girl died after birth, another at 10. His oldest daughter had a prolonged breakdown at 15. Three of his six sons became semi-invalids, and his last son was born mentally retarded and died 19 months after birth.)

His book, Origin of the Species, was first published in November 1859. The full title, On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, reveals the viciousness of the underlying concept; this concept led directly to two of the worst wars in the history of mankind.


In his book, Darwin reasoned from theory to facts, and provided little evidence for what he had to say. Modern evolutionists are ashamed of the book, with its ridiculous arguments.

Darwin’s book had what some men wanted: a clear out-in-the-open, current statement in favor of species change. So, in spite of its laughable imperfections, they capitalized on it. Here is what you will find in his book:

Darwin would cite authorities that he did not mention. He repeatedly said it was "only an abstract," and "a fuller edition" would come out later. But, although he wrote other books, try as he may he never could find the proof for his theories. No one since has found it either.

When he did name an authority, it was just an opinion from a letter. Phrases indicating the hypothetical nature of his ideas were frequent: "It might have been," "Maybe," "probably," "it is conceivable that." A favorite of his was: "Let us take an imaginary example."

Darwin would suggest a possibility, and later refer back to it as a fact: "As we have already demonstrated previously." Elsewhere he would suggest a possible series of events and then conclude by assuming that proved the point.

He relied heavily on stories instead of facts. Confusing examples would be given. He would use specious and devious arguments, and spent much time suggesting possible explanations why the facts he needed were not available.

Here is an example of his reasoning:
To explain the fossil trans-species gaps, Darwin suggested that species must have been changing quickly in other parts of the world where men had not yet examined the strata. Later these changed species traveled over to the Western World, to be found in strata there as new species. So species were changing on the other side of the world, and that was why species in the process of change were not found on our side! To explain the fossil trans-species gaps, Darwin suggested that species must have been changing quickly in other parts of the world where men had not yet examined the strata. Later these changed species traveled over to the Western World, to be found in strata there as new species. So species were changing on the other side of the world, and that was why species in the process of change were not found on our side!


With thinking like this, who needs science? But remember that Charles Darwin never had a day of schooling in the sciences.


Here is Darwin’s explanation of how one species changes into another:
It is a variation of Lamarck’s theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics (Nicholas Hutton III, Evidence of Evolution, 1962, p. 138). Calling it pangenesis, Darwin said that an organ affected by the environment would respond by giving off particles that he called gemmules. These particles supposedly helped determine hereditary characteristics. The environment would affect an organ; gemmules would drop out of the organ; and the gemmules would travel to the reproductive organs, where they would affect the cells (W. Stansfield, Science of Evolution, 1977, p. 38). As mentioned earlier, scientists today are ashamed of Darwin’s ideas.

In his book, Darwin taught that man came from an ape, and that the stronger races would, within a century or two, destroy the weaker ones. (Modern evolutionists claim that man and ape descended from a common ancestor.)

After taking part in the witchcraft ceremonies, not only was his mind affected but his body also. He developed a chronic and incapacitating illness, and went to his death under a depression he could not shake (Random House Encyclopedia, 1977, p. 768).

He frequently commented in private letters that he recognized that there was no evidence for his theory, and that it could destroy the morality of the human race. "Long before the reader has arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of difficulties will have occurred to him. Some of them are so serious that to this day I can hardly reflect on them without in some degree becoming staggered" (Charles Darwin, Origin of the Species, 1860, p. 178; quoted from Harvard Classics, 1909 ed., Vol. 11). "Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a phantasy" (Charles Darwin, Life and Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229).

http://www.drdino.com/QandA/index.jsp?varFolder=CreationEvolution&varPage=HistoryofEvolutionPartOne.jsp

All I am saying is that Darwins "Theory" is utterly fallible, and I am trying to correct a gentleman who refered to evolution as a "fact". As to the evils originating from Darwins theory, there are many. Morality and ethical standards have been greatly reduced. Children and youth are taught in school that they are an advanced level of animals; there are no moral principles. Since they are just animals, they should do whatever they want. Personal survival and success will come only by rivalry, strife, and stepping on others.

I beg all of you who have been taken in by evolution. Someone created this universe. Your question should be who? Good becker, and I, are attempting to convince you it is the God of the Bible.

Buddhism teaches enlightenment. It's about reaching happiness. It does not address how we came to be or where we're going.

Hinduism teaches many strange things, such as reincarnation. How does reincarnation address the inevitable 1st birth? How does it account for population growth if we're all recycled? And it relies heavily on an oppressive caste system.

Islam is an evil off-shoot of Judaism/Christianity. The god Allah in no way resembles the loving God of the Bible. Allah commands his followers to kill unbelievers, and to bring the world under Islamic control by the sword. the prophet Mohammed, the founder of the religion, when pressed to perform miracles to prove what he said, commanded them to read a passage from the Koran instead.

Jesus Christ was a man that shook the world's foundations. If you just READ what he said, you will see he had insight from God. He loves you more than you can ever know, and it grieves him to no end that you scoff at him. I PROMISE you, if you gave him a fair chance, as much of a chance as you gave evolution, he would tug on the strings of your heart.

Most of the time, it is underlying emotional issues that prevent us. I know for me, my parents didn't have the best marriage, and I wondered how a God could be so cold and uncaring. But no no, years later, I realized that it is through pain that we grow! Through pain that he brings us closer to him! Who can help us in the dark, cold, lonely places we go? Christ Jesus! When you realize this, an amazing feeling comes over and stays with you. You literally FEEL his love for you. And I promise you, he answers all of my prayers. It is uncanny to me how he could love me so much.

Darwin in on our £5 notes, on the other side in the queen, head of the church.

No, it isn't. Eventually you'd still get to the first source of life, and where'd it come from?

Can any atheists tell me where the universe comes from? Don't come back with anything about where did God come from, because He's a sentient being with powers that we can't comprehend. The universe is a thing. Tell me where it came from. Until then, you have ZERO right to call someone irrational. Honestly, it's pretty funny when you do.

What if what happened was God? And He will never reveal that completely to us because he wants faith? What then? Will you go to your grave content in the fact that you never made the same mistake only gullible old ladies make and put your trust in the One who loves you unconditonally? Hell, even Einstein said there had to be a God, but I'm sure your IQ puts his to shame.