04 Feb '16 12:50>
YouTube
This video shows a talk by Professor Mariana Mazzucato, who sets out the case for a new economics in the lght of the failure of neoliberal economics, as demonstrated in the theoretically impossible 2008 collapse of the global financial system. Her arguments and (largely American) examples should be of great interest to anyone who is not so deeply entrenched as to be immune to alternative thinking.
The neoliberal notion of public policy and the public sector (whatever that may mean) as simply tools with which to fix otherwise perfect markets is nonsensical because it envisages markets as something objective and out of reach - out there - like say the water in which fish swim - when in reality the market is an output of the political process. We create markets, we shape and reshape them, we change them. It cannot be otherwise.
The public sector as a mere fixing mechanism to repair market failures is insipid. It implies that all of the creative energy and drive lies out in the land of entrepreneurial private capital. The reality is demonstrably very different. It is not that entrepreneurs do not play a vital, indispensible role, but that they are enabled to do so in the context of a web of connections that cut across public and private. Many of the most profound market transformations and technological innovations hav e been born in the public sector and could never have been born under the conditions of venture capitalism. Indeed, the neoliberal project of handing over resources to the venture capitalists from the public domain has been pretty uniformly disastrous in its impacts. For example, the slashing of capital gains taxes since the Seventies not only in the USA, but in Brown's Britian (for example) has not boosted investment, it has boosted cash hoarding and profit taking, including buy back of shares as an utterly unproductive way for companies to use up their idle cash hoards.
Public investment, far from pushing out private enterprise, facilitates it and complements it. The countries that collapsed after 2008 were not the ones with greatest public debt, but the ones with least public investment.
If we want to see an economy that is inclusive and sustainable, then neoliberalism is a disaster and has to be replaced with a more intelligent and democratically directed approach to making and delivering economic polichy.
But there is far more to this talk and I may even have captured it poorly. See for yourselves - those with open minds.
This video shows a talk by Professor Mariana Mazzucato, who sets out the case for a new economics in the lght of the failure of neoliberal economics, as demonstrated in the theoretically impossible 2008 collapse of the global financial system. Her arguments and (largely American) examples should be of great interest to anyone who is not so deeply entrenched as to be immune to alternative thinking.
The neoliberal notion of public policy and the public sector (whatever that may mean) as simply tools with which to fix otherwise perfect markets is nonsensical because it envisages markets as something objective and out of reach - out there - like say the water in which fish swim - when in reality the market is an output of the political process. We create markets, we shape and reshape them, we change them. It cannot be otherwise.
The public sector as a mere fixing mechanism to repair market failures is insipid. It implies that all of the creative energy and drive lies out in the land of entrepreneurial private capital. The reality is demonstrably very different. It is not that entrepreneurs do not play a vital, indispensible role, but that they are enabled to do so in the context of a web of connections that cut across public and private. Many of the most profound market transformations and technological innovations hav e been born in the public sector and could never have been born under the conditions of venture capitalism. Indeed, the neoliberal project of handing over resources to the venture capitalists from the public domain has been pretty uniformly disastrous in its impacts. For example, the slashing of capital gains taxes since the Seventies not only in the USA, but in Brown's Britian (for example) has not boosted investment, it has boosted cash hoarding and profit taking, including buy back of shares as an utterly unproductive way for companies to use up their idle cash hoards.
Public investment, far from pushing out private enterprise, facilitates it and complements it. The countries that collapsed after 2008 were not the ones with greatest public debt, but the ones with least public investment.
If we want to see an economy that is inclusive and sustainable, then neoliberalism is a disaster and has to be replaced with a more intelligent and democratically directed approach to making and delivering economic polichy.
But there is far more to this talk and I may even have captured it poorly. See for yourselves - those with open minds.