Women heads of state

YouTube

"As it turns out, women actually can be president...of other countries. Sam and Madeleine Albright find out more. "

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0AhzLEXWgY

"As it turns out, women actually can be president...of other countries. Sam and Madeleine Albright find out more. "

Gender isn't the issue.
Character and qualifications are.
HRC has neither.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Gender isn't the issue.
Character and qualifications are.
HRC has neither.

To say that she has no qualifications tips your transparency.
Isn't it awkward being so obvious?
Why don't you leave it that she has no character, where you at least have a case to make?
Trump has your same problem which is why he can't beat a very venerable Clinton.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Gender isn't the issue.
Character and qualifications are.
HRC has neither.

You also claim the earth is flat, that men never went to the moon and that 9/11 was an "inside job".


So much for your whack-a-doodle-doo opinions.

Originally posted by Suzianne
You also claim the earth is flat, that men never went to the moon and that 9/11 was an "inside job".


So much for your whack-a-doodle-doo opinions.

you can look with a telescope and see the footprints on the moon's surface.

Originally posted by Ashiitaka
you can look with a telescope and see the footprints on the moon's surface.

Apparently not from earth.

http://calgary.rasc.ca/moonscope.htm

Originally posted by Suzianne
You also claim the earth is flat, that men never went to the moon and that 9/11 was an "inside job".


So much for your whack-a-doodle-doo opinions.

And you claim to be a woman.
At least my perspective has the weight of evidence behind it.
Yours is just wishful thinking.

Originally posted by stevemcc
To say that she has no qualifications tips your transparency.
Isn't it awkward being so obvious?
Why don't you leave it that she has no character, where you at least have a case to make?
Trump has your same problem which is why he can't beat a very venerable Clinton.

The things that stand as her qualifications (according to her supporters) are the very things which disqualify her.
She had a dismal record as a senator from her carpetbagging days.
Her time as SoS was an unmitigated disaster, from insanely wretched decisions which cost people's lives to pedestrian issues so painfully obvious to even entry level internet users such as email security, she has proven time after time we wouldn't trust her as the town dog catcher.
She's been a flop at literally everything she's put her hand to or on, save one: she speeches like an angel, if the prices people have been paying to hear her sing in private is any indication.
Them words she uses are SO eloquent, SO powerful and SO inspiring, the hoi polloi have been forbidden to hear them.
Maybe we just let her give speeches instead?

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
And you claim to be a woman.
At least my perspective has the weight of evidence behind it.
Yours is just wishful thinking.

"At least my perspective has the weight of evidence behind it."
that the earth is flat?

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
"At least my perspective has the weight of evidence behind it."
that the earth is flat?

What else could I have possibly been referencing in response to Suzianne's irrelevant off-topic comment?
Yes, the weight of evidence (that which counts as factual scientific evidence) points to a flat earth.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
What else could I have possibly been referencing in response to Suzianne's irrelevant off-topic comment?
Yes, the weight of evidence (that which counts as factual scientific evidence) points to a flat earth.

Uh-huh...

As I said, so much for your whack-a-doodle-doo opinions.

Evidence of Hillary's "guilt" is equally as tenuous and fanciful.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Uh-huh...

As I said, so much for your whack-a-doodle-doo opinions.

Evidence of Hillary's "guilt" is equally as tenuous and fanciful.

You either have your head up your ass or you are simply blinded by your hatred toward men to consider that crook anything other than criminal.

What's even more problematic is your insistence on continuing to bring up a topic--- attempting to use it as a bell weather--- which you have literally no knowledge about one way or another.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
What else could I have possibly been referencing in response to Suzianne's irrelevant off-topic comment?
Yes, the weight of evidence (that which counts as factual scientific evidence) points to a flat earth.

Just out of curiosity, why do you suppose people lie about a round earth?

Originally posted by whodey
Just out of curiosity, why do you suppose people lie about a round earth?

What people?
The majority of people who state the world is round are doing so on the basis of other's declarations.
There are very few who are in any kind of position to know.
Not sure what Freemasonry's stake in the game might be, but what an incredibly odd coincidence for all "astronauts" to have been part of that secret society, right?

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
What people?
The majority of people who state the world is round are doing so on the basis of other's declarations.
There are very few who are in any kind of position to know.
Not sure what Freemasonry's stake in the game might be, but what an incredibly odd coincidence for all "astronauts" to have been part of that secret society, right?

I suggest you take your medicine in time for Nov. 8th.