24 Jul '16 16:00>
This is an election year and we need a new "In Crowd" here at Red Hot Pawn.
Nominations?
Nominations?
Originally posted by HandyAndyIs this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
This is an election year and we need a new "In Crowd" here at Red Hot Pawn.
Nominations?
Originally posted by SuzianneSuzianne,
Is this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
Labeling the 'In' crowd as such defeats the entire purpose, I would think. They don't need to be labeled, and they are amorphous since people come and go. And popularity is such a fleeting, tawdry thing that everyone reacts differently to.
Originally posted by SuzianneSurely a thread like this is a blatant attempt to give people an opportunity to post whatever they want in a lighthearted way and not a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement?
Is this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
Originally posted by SuzianneIs this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
Is this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
Labeling the 'In' crowd as such defeats the entire purpose, I would think. They don't need to be labeled, and they are amorphous since people come and go. And popularity is such a fleeting, tawdry thing that everyone reacts differently to.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou're just mad because trisha80 is on the list and you're not.
Is this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
Labeling the 'In' crowd as such defeats the entire purpose, I would think. They don't need to be labeled, and they are amorphous since people come and go. And popularity is such a fleeting, tawdry thing that everyone reacts differently to.
Originally posted by HandyAndyYou better put me on the list Andy or I'm going to haunt you about it for the rest of your life in these forums! 😉
[b]Is this just a blatant attempt to shout down anyone not liked in a 'divide and conquer' movement tried by others here on and off?
Yes.
Labeling the 'In' crowd as such defeats the entire purpose, I would think. They don't need to be labeled, and they are amorphous since people come and go. And popularity is such a fleeting, tawdry thing th ...[text shortened]... acts differently to.
Great suggestion! Your name has been added to the list of nominees.[/b]
Originally posted by HandyAndySeitse, sonhouse, wolfgang59, Grampy Bobby, Ponderable, vandervelde, FreakyKBH, Kegge, huckleberryhound, apathist, divegester, Ghost of a Duke, NoEartlyReason, moonbus, and, last but not least, me.
This is an election year and we need a new "In Crowd" here at Red Hot Pawn.
Nominations?