Originally posted by Deputy Daddy
December 11 will mark the 44th anniversary since the last man has walked on the moon....the moon simply is not relevant any more. Even if man did go there, lots can happen in 44 years. 12 men have walked on the moon, in the grand scheme of things, how much evidence could they really have left behind?
Are you really willing to learn like your blurb says? EVEN if man did go there? So you still question the whole deal. I assume then you were maybe not even born in 1970 or 69 so you just believe the treasonous asssholes whose motive is simply to make money selling their scam books.
Here's the deal: the technology to fake the moon landing did not exist back then. I can personally attest to the primitive state of computers back then, they didn't even have screens or keyboards much less software to do the kind of graphics we see in the stupid kids movies of today.
At the time, one of my jobs besides Apollo, was the ANALOG computer that was used for one thing: to simulate whether or not a spinning satellite that would have boxes inside at some positions around the inside, the question was, would it spin straight or would it start wobbling. The analog comp that did that job did it's job pretty well and a lot faster than the digital comps of the day but they were a pain in the ass to program.
How that happened, was they had a patch panel with something like a thousand tie points you soldered point to point wires that would go to various kinds of electronics, like OP amps, differential units, integrators, and getting the parameters in took almost a week of solid work soldering hundreds of contacts together.
That was just for one simulation. To do another one with more stuff inside or a cube shape required yet another patch panel so it was quite a job going from one simulation to another.
So my boss ATT, Horst Schlingloff, an MSEE, designed a link between the primitive digital computers of the day, to control the inputs of a slightly more advanced analog computer which had motor driven pots which you could then use to simulate stuff.
So now, to change from one simulation to another, you 'just' reprogrammed the digital machine, which had it's own set of pains to program, they had to use punched cards, one for each step of a program and you might have 2000 of those cards all being read by a card reader and then into the comp. But it was still a lot faster than having me wire up a whole patch panel one wire at a time with literally dozens or hundreds of interconnections.
That was state of the art back then. There was ABSOLUTELY no way they could simulate walking around on the moon with the crap from 2001, Space Odyssey kind of stuff they had back then. One problem is they had no way of knowing, for instance, just what it would look like when dust was kicked up by boots on the moon dust. They had to see that for real on the moon to be able to do that with any kind of accuracy.
Another thing, it was AMERICANS who wrote the moon landing denier books. If ANYONE on the planet had anything to gain from such treason, it would have been the Soviets, they would have jumped on that like a dog on a bone. But they didn't. You know why? Because they TRIED and failed, and they had decent radar back then and they tracked Apollo craft to the moon. They KNEW we went there, there was no question in their minds and if you think there was some kind of grand conspiracy, the Soviets would have to have been in on it and that is something they would never have done in a million years. They would have been screaming from the floor of the UN building the day they found out it was faked.
Like I said, IMHO, making up fake moon landing stories was treason against the US, plain and simple and those asssholes should have been shoved in prison.