17 Jan '17 18:25>
Eugene Cernan
(for Seitse)
(for Seitse)
Originally posted by sonhouseThere's soft and then there's stubborn.
That's how you end up being a flatasser.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI know which one of us bases our results on real science not spudoscience you use. You have to DISS science for your results to be valid. You also consider yourself to be as smart as all the civilization changers like Newton, Einstein and the like. That is total arrogance.
There's soft and then there's stubborn.
Stubborn refuses to consider facts which call into question ideas and concepts toward which one may be soft.
By way of example, consider your stubbornness with respect to irrefutable facts.
1. You couldn't provide an answer for how a prop (Super Bowl football) made its way to the ISS, so we had to set the issue ...[text shortened]...
Between you and me, which of us do you think a reasonable person would conclude is stubborn?
Originally posted by sonhouse[as predicted... ]
I know which one of us bases our results on real science not spudoscience you use. You have to DISS science for your results to be valid. You also consider yourself to be as smart as all the civilization changers like Newton, Einstein and the like. That is total arrogance.
I don't claim any such thing, but I have studied science all my life as opposed to y ...[text shortened]... ing somehow in your paranoid fantasy world that the world is flat. Good luck with your paranoia.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHNo, I just live in the REAL world not some flatasser fantasy. You cannot find the answers in science so you just diss all of them. EXACTLY like RJ Hinds disses any science that in any way can disprove the 6000 year old Earth. You should compare notes, you might even come up with something new. I notice you cannot answer the trip around the equator where on the REAL world you don't turn left or right EVER to just follow the equator. You cannot answer that except more Nya Nya, I can't hear you so you figure if you just ignore it it might go away.
[as predicted... ]
So.
I can put you down as...
"stubborn," right?
Originally posted by sonhouseWhy would I answer a question which has already asked and answered?
No, I just live in the REAL world not some flatasser fantasy. You cannot find the answers in science so you just diss all of them. EXACTLY like RJ Hinds disses any science that in any way can disprove the 6000 year old Earth. You should compare notes, you might even come up with something new. I notice you cannot answer the trip around the equator where on ...[text shortened]... that except more Nya Nya, I can't hear you so you figure if you just ignore it it might go away.