09 Oct '15 19:03>
to the artistic sense of the successful, the "black sites". the free sites have little in the way of a forum.
so the forum must be dynamic.
the redbhotforum was once interesting ( the days of moldy crow and exspressive outburst, etc, but then moderaters or owners with their own social and political agenda began to overly moderate the forums ( my ancient history with scheming mind as "lame wolf" ).
then chess.com came along. i good site for the value that they have a social section for photos to be posted ( although the forum is not good,,,,not that it is overmoderated it is structurally so hard to find posts ).,
what is the point ?
russ' apartment must be a disaster. he needs to invite sietse over to london to remake his home. more color. more darkness. in the blackness we find our own individual color. let us find it.
an open forum, limited only by not the agenda of yourself or your moderators but only by decent english...no matter what one might say. in the Queen's English, no matter what are opinions might me.
to offer better chessboards. look at the chessboards of the successfull, chesscube and gameknot and learn from them. look not to your own frail sense of asthetics.
the price of the site need not be changed.
but, a free tournament of five days time, limited to the first thirty free members who sign up might give free members a sense of the site of why they should stay. thirty players only for a five day tournament. surely there would be two or three free players, with a better interface ( black like chesscube and gameknot ) and who experience a truly free but civil open forum, would create two or three new paying members every five days. six or twelve new members a month, each month, every month....so that the site could remain alive your yourself and for us ??
so the forum must be dynamic.
the redbhotforum was once interesting ( the days of moldy crow and exspressive outburst, etc, but then moderaters or owners with their own social and political agenda began to overly moderate the forums ( my ancient history with scheming mind as "lame wolf" ).
then chess.com came along. i good site for the value that they have a social section for photos to be posted ( although the forum is not good,,,,not that it is overmoderated it is structurally so hard to find posts ).,
what is the point ?
russ' apartment must be a disaster. he needs to invite sietse over to london to remake his home. more color. more darkness. in the blackness we find our own individual color. let us find it.
an open forum, limited only by not the agenda of yourself or your moderators but only by decent english...no matter what one might say. in the Queen's English, no matter what are opinions might me.
to offer better chessboards. look at the chessboards of the successfull, chesscube and gameknot and learn from them. look not to your own frail sense of asthetics.
the price of the site need not be changed.
but, a free tournament of five days time, limited to the first thirty free members who sign up might give free members a sense of the site of why they should stay. thirty players only for a five day tournament. surely there would be two or three free players, with a better interface ( black like chesscube and gameknot ) and who experience a truly free but civil open forum, would create two or three new paying members every five days. six or twelve new members a month, each month, every month....so that the site could remain alive your yourself and for us ??