Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
Ordinarily, I'd say it was a brilliant ploy by Russ to send our RHP rejects off to a competing site.
But the chess.com forums were already pretty screwed up before.
I reject the premise that it was a brilliant move. Had the forum moderation adequately dealt with the situation it would not have allowed itself to escalate to the point where people were being banned. Simply issue a warning and if its ignored a forum ban. If they do it again increase the forum ban. People don't leave the site because they want to, they leave it because they feel they have been treated unfairly or unjustly.
Chess dot com suffers from the fact that most of the content is pure drool. Crybabies have managed to sanitise the content to the stage where its nothing but insipid drivel that is allowed to pass. You are not allowed to name and shame, you are not supposed to mention religion, you are not supposed to mention politics, you are not supposed to mention rival chess sites, like they don't exist. As a site personally I find that chess dot com tries to dumb everything down, its not correspondence chess but 'daily chess' as if correspondence is too large a word and might put some prospective airheads off joining the site.
The issue of how sites deal with cheating is rather interesting. Here there used to be moderation. Why it failed i cannot say. At chess dot com they simply ban you outright. On lichess dot com they label you as someone who uses computer assistance. You cannot see it but others can. Its a great pity that people are withholding revenue from this site because of what they perceive as a lack of implementation of a cheating policy. Personally I don't care because i know that I cannot beat a computer at chess and those who use them are depriving themselves of any chance of becoming a stronger player.
With my friends gone its difficult to see how long I will last hear. Its a great pity, I have learned many things that I did not know before from friends and enemies alike.