Stalemate

Standard memberTexKing
Help 17 Aug '06 23:42
  1. Standard memberTexKing
    chess stumbler . . .
    Spring, TX
    Joined
    30 May '06
    Moves
    19776
    17 Aug '06 23:42
    opponent is calling our game a stalemate -- he wants me to draw -- he has plenty of moves left -- stalemate would be a condition recognized by the chess software, no? it's not an "agreed upon" condition.

    Please affirm.
  2. Joined
    28 Feb '05
    Moves
    20005
    18 Aug '06 00:05
    Presumably it's this game Game 2314800. This is definately not stalemate as defined in the rules of chess, ie there are no legal moves left to play by one side. The site recognises true stalemate and a draw is awarded accordingly. You can continue playing the game if you wish, your opponent cannot make you take the draw.

    ~corp1131
  3. Standard memberTexKing
    chess stumbler . . .
    Spring, TX
    Joined
    30 May '06
    Moves
    19776
    18 Aug '06 00:07
    You are right on the money -- thank you.
  4. Joined
    10 Nov '05
    Moves
    995
    18 Aug '06 00:26
    I know its not a formal stalemate thats not the question texking misunderstood what I was saying
  5. Standard memberTexKing
    chess stumbler . . .
    Spring, TX
    Joined
    30 May '06
    Moves
    19776
    18 Aug '06 00:50
    game ended drawn in the end -- I wanted to play it out -- good tenacious play by opponent
  6. Joined
    26 May '02
    Moves
    72546
    19 Aug '06 01:15
    Originally posted by TexKing
    game ended drawn in the end -- I wanted to play it out -- good tenacious play by opponent
    You missed a win! This was the position on move 69.



    Instead of moving the bishop, 69..Kxh6 would have won.

    Eg. 70.Kxd5 Kg5 71.Ke4 Kg4 72.Ke3 Kg3 73.Ke2 Kg2 74.Ke3 h5 75.Kf4 h4 76.Kg4 h3 and the pawn cannot be prevented from queening.
  7. London
    Joined
    28 Sep '04
    Moves
    110329
    19 Aug '06 12:38
    Originally posted by corp1131
    Presumably it's this game Game 2314800. This is definately not stalemate as defined in the rules of chess, ie there are no legal moves left to play by one side. The site recognises true stalemate and a draw is awarded accordingly. You can continue playing the game if you wish, your opponent cannot make you take the draw.

    ~corp1131
    Althought the site does not recognise that as an automatic draw, if you press "claim draw" with just two kings on the board it should (I'm pretty sure) give you the mate.
  8. Joined
    28 Feb '05
    Moves
    20005
    20 Aug '06 00:28
    Originally posted by Freddie2006
    Althought the site does not recognise that as an automatic draw, if you press "claim draw" with just two kings on the board it should (I'm pretty sure) give you the mate.
    Never knew that, I thought that in that situation the site would automatically give the draw. You learn something new every day.
  9. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    20 Aug '06 15:052 edits
    Originally posted by Freddie2006
    Althought the site does not recognise that as an automatic draw, if you press "claim draw" with just two kings on the board it should (I'm pretty sure) give you the mate.
    huh? Mate???
  10. Standard memberKrapsparov
    Don't baptise cats!!
    Manchester
    Joined
    18 Jun '06
    Moves
    66061
    21 Aug '06 13:25
    Originally posted by David Tebb
    You missed a win! This was the position on move 69.

    [fen]8/7p/7N/3bK2k/8/8/8/8 b - - 0 69[/fen]

    Instead of moving the bishop, 69..Kxh6 would have won.

    Eg. 70.Kxd5 Kg5 71.Ke4 Kg4 72.Ke3 Kg3 73.Ke2 Kg2 74.Ke3 h5 75.Kf4 h4 76.Kg4 h3 and the pawn cannot be prevented from queening.
    Are you the same David Tebb that hammered Kasparov?
    Well done :o)

    I have not looked at the position in any great depth but after kxn, can the opposing king not take the bishop but instead eventualy get in front of the pawn on h2?
  11. Joined
    26 May '02
    Moves
    72546
    21 Aug '06 14:382 edits
    Originally posted by Krapsparov
    Are you the same David Tebb that hammered Kasparov?
    Well done :o)

    I have not looked at the position in any great depth but after kxn, can the opposing king not take the bishop but instead eventualy get in front of the pawn on h2?
    Yeah, I'm the guy. Although I wouldn't say I 'hammered' him. It was more a case of reluctantly accepting his piece sacrifice and hanging on for dear life until his attack ran out of steam and then mopping up in the endgame.

    Coming back to this game, if White doesn't take the bishop then he will easily lose because the bishop is the "right colour". In other words, the bishop controls the queening square of the pawn, so that the defending side cannot just sit in the corner and acheive a draw by stalemate.



    For instance in this position (with White to move) White must move his King to g1, allowing ..Kg3, followed by ..h2 and the pawn queening.

    If it was Black's move, he would just make a waiting move with either his bishop or King in order to give White the move (putting him in 'zugzwang'😉.
  12. Joined
    26 May '02
    Moves
    72546
    21 Aug '06 14:48
    If Black's bishop had been the "wrong colour" then it would have been impossible for him to win (against correct defence). The best he can do is stalemate White, which is only a draw.



    For instance in this position, White should just move his King beween g1 and h1 and Black cannot make progress.
  13. Standard memberKrapsparov
    Don't baptise cats!!
    Manchester
    Joined
    18 Jun '06
    Moves
    66061
    21 Aug '06 15:14
    Thanks David.
    It was the waiting move that I was missing.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree