Three times repetition draws
01 Aug '12 09:492 editsDear All, I have a lovely opponent whom I play repeat games against. Her rating is very low, (not that I regard my rating as high at all – on the contrary), but I enjoy playing her and she is improving. She has now twice requested me to agree to a draw on the basis that she has repeated the same move three times. Admittedly she is genuine and certainly no chancer and this only happened when she had only her King on the board or the remaining pawn unable to move. To me the concept has always been quite clear and not an issue; but I seem to be quite unable to explain it to her in simple terms and she remains uncertain. I even Googled the concept and cut and pasted it for her. Here is the portion I Googled:-
"Threefold Repetition
If the same position is reached with the same player to move three times during a game, either player may immediately claim a draw. The procedure for claiming this draw varies somewhat between rule sets, but the rule itself is fairly standard across the board. This rule exists to stop games in which both sides are simply repeating moves.
It's worth noting that there's no actual rule that allows players to claim a draw by perpetual check. However, the threefold repetition rule (along with the next type of draw) covers this eventuality; if one player is landing checks again and again without any way for their opponent to escape, they will eventually repeat the same position three times, forcing a draw."
Come to think of it, this definition is not crystal and she seems to think that this definition proves her point.
I also invited to her claim a draw to see if the computer agrees with her. We are not having an argument about it but I feel somewhat silly in not being able to convince her with a clear and simple definition of exactly what constitutes a Three Times Repetition Draw.
Here are some of my advices to her:-
“I cut and pasted the piece about three times repetition draws for you. Here it is. I noticed that I incorrectly told you both players must make the same move 3 times (although this could be the reason for such a draw.) It is actually one player making 3 repetitive moves WHICH HAS THE RESULT THAT THE SAME POSITION IS REACHED. To apply that to our game, it does not matter if you make the same move over and over again, the SAME POSITION IS NOT REACHED VIZ A VIZ ME. I hope that helps. But do write to the website, they will assist you.
Another thing, if a player feels entitled to a draw (there is also the 50 move-rule draw), you can attempt to claim it. Look next to the board, there you will find "Claim draw". If ever you feel that you are entitled to one, attempt to claim one. The engine driving this site is very good and will advise you accordingly.
Here is the cut and pasted portion…”
So – to make a long story short; is anyone able to assist me with a lucid, simple and clear definition of a Three Times Repetition Draw? In fact so simple that a child would understand it?
I may add that the explanation under FAQ's also did not convince her.
May I also ask the following questions:- Such a draw is not automatic is it, as is the case with stalemate? Does one have to claim it? And I do suppose that any moves after the three repetitive moves mean you have forfeited the right to claim a draw?
Kind regards
Leon
"Threefold Repetition
If the same position is reached with the same player to move three times during a game, either player may immediately claim a draw. The procedure for claiming this draw varies somewhat between rule sets, but the rule itself is fairly standard across the board. This rule exists to stop games in which both sides are simply repeating moves.
It's worth noting that there's no actual rule that allows players to claim a draw by perpetual check. However, the threefold repetition rule (along with the next type of draw) covers this eventuality; if one player is landing checks again and again without any way for their opponent to escape, they will eventually repeat the same position three times, forcing a draw."
Come to think of it, this definition is not crystal and she seems to think that this definition proves her point.
I also invited to her claim a draw to see if the computer agrees with her. We are not having an argument about it but I feel somewhat silly in not being able to convince her with a clear and simple definition of exactly what constitutes a Three Times Repetition Draw.
Here are some of my advices to her:-
“I cut and pasted the piece about three times repetition draws for you. Here it is. I noticed that I incorrectly told you both players must make the same move 3 times (although this could be the reason for such a draw.) It is actually one player making 3 repetitive moves WHICH HAS THE RESULT THAT THE SAME POSITION IS REACHED. To apply that to our game, it does not matter if you make the same move over and over again, the SAME POSITION IS NOT REACHED VIZ A VIZ ME. I hope that helps. But do write to the website, they will assist you.
Another thing, if a player feels entitled to a draw (there is also the 50 move-rule draw), you can attempt to claim it. Look next to the board, there you will find "Claim draw". If ever you feel that you are entitled to one, attempt to claim one. The engine driving this site is very good and will advise you accordingly.
Here is the cut and pasted portion…”
So – to make a long story short; is anyone able to assist me with a lucid, simple and clear definition of a Three Times Repetition Draw? In fact so simple that a child would understand it?
I may add that the explanation under FAQ's also did not convince her.
May I also ask the following questions:- Such a draw is not automatic is it, as is the case with stalemate? Does one have to claim it? And I do suppose that any moves after the three repetitive moves mean you have forfeited the right to claim a draw?
Kind regards
Leon
Back to Top