25 Jan '06 21:55>
Would you ever consider a tournament that had predictable pairings rather than random for a 64 person tournament grouped by in fours ?
Group 1: seeds 1, 17, 33, 49
Group 2: seeds 2. 18. 34. 50
Group 3: seeds 3, 19, 35, 51
etc. for the first round
For the second round even if there were more than 16 people as a result of group ties in the first round, they could be grouped in the same manner:
Group 1: remaining seeds 1, 5, 9, 13
Group 2: remaining seeds 2, 6, 10, 14
etc. then, if necessary, seed 17 would go into group 1, 18 into group 2, etc.
I love the site and I will continue to play in every grouped random that I can I was just curious if this had been considered or done in the past and if there was any interest in doing something like this now.
Group 1: seeds 1, 17, 33, 49
Group 2: seeds 2. 18. 34. 50
Group 3: seeds 3, 19, 35, 51
etc. for the first round
For the second round even if there were more than 16 people as a result of group ties in the first round, they could be grouped in the same manner:
Group 1: remaining seeds 1, 5, 9, 13
Group 2: remaining seeds 2, 6, 10, 14
etc. then, if necessary, seed 17 would go into group 1, 18 into group 2, etc.
I love the site and I will continue to play in every grouped random that I can I was just curious if this had been considered or done in the past and if there was any interest in doing something like this now.