Originally posted by SkippyJoe
I give up on the analysis. It's clear to me that there is no validity to it but there is no point arguing. I was a statistician and computer scientist and I have written a chess program, but that was some time ago.
I don't see the relevance of the number of strong human players vs engines. I don't even think that is meaningful. Engines are better - way ...[text shortened]... on) it's just someone who enjoys playing chess and may be better - maybe much better - than you.
Yet again, your total lack of understanding of what I previously posted is obvious for all to see.
Where is my 1 second per half-move analysis?
Who said that human players are "better" than engines?
Why is there no validity in comparing a suspected cheats chosen moves with those chosen by an engine in the same positions?
How would
you look for suspected engine users if you wanted to?
I showed that if you give an engine 20 minutes or 80 to analyse a game, even with different engines, the results are very similar.
Your argument is a bunch of strawmen & when you can't respond adequately you just run away.
Whilst most people play for fun, there is a thread running about the lack of titled players on this site & offering free membership . What could a FIDE titled player possibly gain from playing anyone on the first couple of pages of highest rateds on this site that they couldn't get from training against an engine?
The higher rated tournaments & annual championships have long been a joke (I know because I analysed some of them back when idiotic engine users
were banned) & any serious OTB players would avoid playing on this site like the plague since engine use is tacitly allowed.
Oh, and by the way, several FIDE titled players were banned from here (and other sites too) for blatant engine use several years ago. Why do they do it? Do some googling & send them an email.