17 Sep '15 09:31>
Hey All,
With the following partial game shown at http://www.365chess.com
Efim Geller vs. Istvan Csom
Budapest 1973 · Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer, Rauzer attack, 7...a6 (B66) · 1-0
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 a6 8. O-O-O h6 9. Be3 Bd7 10. f4 Qc7 11. Bd3 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 Bc6 13. Rhe1 O-O-O 14. Qf2 Nd7
According to http://www.365chess.com
====================================
With 11. Kb1 there is 60% winning with White
With 11. h3 there is 52.9% winning with White
With 11. Bd3 there is only 25% winning with White
Is "11. Bd3" a bad move outright rather than just statistically? And is 14. ...Nd7 better than 14. ...Ng4?
With the following partial game shown at http://www.365chess.com
Efim Geller vs. Istvan Csom
Budapest 1973 · Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer, Rauzer attack, 7...a6 (B66) · 1-0
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 a6 8. O-O-O h6 9. Be3 Bd7 10. f4 Qc7 11. Bd3 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 Bc6 13. Rhe1 O-O-O 14. Qf2 Nd7
According to http://www.365chess.com
====================================
With 11. Kb1 there is 60% winning with White
With 11. h3 there is 52.9% winning with White
With 11. Bd3 there is only 25% winning with White
Is "11. Bd3" a bad move outright rather than just statistically? And is 14. ...Nd7 better than 14. ...Ng4?