1. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    01 Oct '15 19:361 edit
    : 06 : 68 : 88 : -- : 98 :

    These numbers follow a specific sequence.
    The colons are only used as a seperator. They do not represent a math function.
    Each number has two digits.
    What is the correct missing number at "--" ?
  2. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    02 Oct '15 05:04
    Originally posted by mwmiller
    : 06 : 68 : 88 : -- : 98 :

    These numbers follow a specific sequence.
    The colons are only used as a seperator. They do not represent a math function.
    Each number has two digits.
    What is the correct missing number at "--" ?
    I cannot write the correct answer with my keyboard. 🙁
  3. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    02 Oct '15 11:21
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    I cannot write the correct answer with my keyboard. 🙁
    Can you spell it out then? If you think for example that the correct number is 22, just type "twenty two". (That isn't it, but you get the idea.....) 🙂
  4. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    03 Oct '15 01:29
    I know what it is I saw it on Facebook...no need for me to spoil it.
  5. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    03 Oct '15 01:45
    Originally posted by mwmiller
    : 06 : 68 : 88 : -- : 98 :

    These numbers follow a specific sequence.
    The colons are only used as a seperator. They do not represent a math function.
    Each number has two digits.
    What is the correct missing number at "--" ?
    One of the digits of the missing number isn't exactly a number.
  6. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    03 Oct '15 01:571 edit
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    One of the digits of the missing number isn't exactly a number.
    No, it's a regular number with two regular digits.
  7. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    03 Oct '15 03:10
    Originally posted by mwmiller
    No, it's a regular number with two regular digits.
    Sorry, that was a bad explanation. The number has actual numerical digits as it's read, but it's use in interpreting the pattern only has one "actual" digit. Right?
  8. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    03 Oct '15 07:47
  9. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    03 Oct '15 11:38
    Thas is correct ATY!.
  10. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    03 Oct '15 11:43
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    Sorry, that was a bad explanation. The number has actual numerical digits as it's read, but it's use in interpreting the pattern only has one "actual" digit. Right?
    These are just examples and are not the answer.
    It has two actual digits, such as 53 or 42. It is a two-digit number.
  11. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    03 Oct '15 12:301 edit
    Originally posted by mwmiller
    These are just examples and are not the answer.
    It has two actual digits, such as 53 or 42. It is a two-digit number.
    I would argue that 78 is the answer. Not 87. If that can't be recognized as a valid point, then I would say the neither answer is fully correct.
  12. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    03 Oct '15 13:50
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    I would argue that 78 is the answer. Not 87. If that can't be recognized as a valid point, then I would say the neither answer is fully correct.
    78 is not correct.
    The original string of numbers are presented upside-down.
    If you invert the entire string you will see that 87 is the correct missing number in the sequence.
  13. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    03 Oct '15 18:16
    Originally posted by mwmiller
    78 is not correct.
    The original string of numbers are presented upside-down.
    If you invert the entire string you will see that 87 is the correct missing number in the sequence.
    But you should also notice that as you read the string from left to right, all the inversions are numbers themselves. Not a regular number and an inverted number.
  14. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    03 Oct '15 18:26
    Originally posted by joe shmo
    But you should also notice that as you read the string from left to right, all the inversions are numbers themselves. Not a regular number and an inverted number.
    We were supposed to be looking for a "number" that fills the gap in the sequence if you put 87 as the answer the original sequence reads

    06,68,88,L8,98

    L8 is clearly not 2 numbers
  15. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101095
    03 Oct '15 20:13
    When I invert the string and look at it I see :86:--:88:89:90:
    The missing number is 87 when I follow that sequence.

    So maybe I needed to present the original puzzle better.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree