23 Nov '15 22:40>1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadThere is a difference between discovering 'life' and discovering a 'technological space faring civilisation'.
Your strategy does require that their goal be to eliminate us and to not really care about the environment.
In my opinion real space faring aliens probably wouldn't care too much about us militarily but might be interested in studying the the environment (biology in particular including us).
If we discover life on Mars our first thought wouldn't be 'lets nuke them'.
There was a video I posted in the "of course it's aliens" thread from a scientist looking at exploratory
engineering and what it can tell us about the Fermi paradox.
von Neumann probes and Dyson spheres: what exploratory engineering can tell us about the Fermi paradox
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zQTfuI-9jIo
It's a slightly irritating video in that it's a fairly informal lecture being video'd and not a professional presentation
but the subject matter is interesting enough that it's worth ignoring that.
[EDIT: the other irritation in the video is that some of the interruptions/questions are a bit annoying.]
The basic conclusion which I agree with [although I take issue with a couple of simplifications in the argument
but they don't actually change the outcome] is that if you have the capability to build automated construction
robots [which we do, in theory if not yet in practice] then you can build a Dyson Sphere and colonise almost
the entire visible universe. [basically everything close enough that it's not already beyond a light speed
horizon]
Which means that any OTHER civilisation with that level of technology could also do the same.
Which means you have a problem where whoever does it first conquers then entire universe.
So any other alien civilisation has the potential to do this, and is thus a threat.
To stop them, you must do it first.
Thus game theory makes a strong case that you should build a Dyson Sphere and conquer the universe to
stop anyone else doing it.
The easiest way to stop alien civilisations is to wipe them out as fast as possible before they become
a multi-star-system species and much harder to kill. So you send a relativity bomb to any nascent civ'
you spot, with the understanding that sending a probe to survey them and then get the results back
would take years/centuries/millennia depending on how far away they are. In which time they could
develop past the point of easy elimination. And indeed, past the point at which they have already sent out
a vast fleet of von Neumann probes to colonise the universe.
Now, it might be IF there are alien civilisations that they are peaceful and won't try to kill us. Not a possibility
I would want to bank on, but it could be the case.
However, IF we are talking about a hostile civilisation, I see no reason not to go strait for the relativity bomb.