1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    21 Jan '17 13:331 edit
    http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/stories/physicists-may-have-just-manipulated-pure-nothingness

    It's one of those philosophical questions we occasionally ponder: What is nothing? Can nothing be something? If not, then how can something come from nothing?

    If there's one scientific field on the forefront of such conceptual paradoxes, it's quantum theory. And in quantum theory, nothing actually is something ... sort of.

    See, according to quantum mechanics, even an empty vacuum is not really empty. It's filled with strange virtual particles that blink in and out of existence in timespans too short to observe. Nothingness, on the quantum level, exists on a level of intuitive absurdity; a kind of existence that is paradoxical but, in some conceptual sense, necessary.

    Science isn't usually comfortable dealing with phenomena that can't be observed. That's what makes this latest breakthrough, from physicists at University of Konstanz in Germany, so very profound and important. According to their research, recently published in the journal Nature, the nothingness that exists on the quantum level is not only something, but its fluctuations can be grasped, manipulated, and perhaps even observed.

    That's not supposed to be possible on the quantum level. One of the truly mind-bending axioms of quantum mechanics relates to something called Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Basically, it's the idea that you can't measure something on the quantum level without fundamentally altering it. In other words, as soon as you attempt to observe some quantum system, the very act of observing it destroys it.

    What the University of Konstanz researchers are claiming goes against this fundamental principle. They claim to have peered directly into the darkness and to have seen it for what it truly is. Or at least, they believe they have uncovered a method for actually observing things on the quantum level without destroying it.

    Getting a handle on nothingness

    How did they do this? Their method essentially involves firing a super short laser pulse lasting only a few femtoseconds (which, if you're counting, is measured on the level of millionths of a billionths of a second) into a "squeezed" vacuum. As the light fires through this vacuum, subtle changes in the polarization of the light can be analyzed to reveal a map, of sorts, of the quantum nothingness.

    The "squeezing" of the vacuum is the real magic of this method. Perhaps the easiest way to think about it relates to what happens when you squeeze a balloon. The balloon expands and tightens in some areas and feels depleted in others.

    This principle is charted on the graphic seen at the top of this article. As the vacuum is squeezed, quantum fluctuations peak in some parts of the vacuum while other parts actually drop to below the background noise level. If the method proves to be sound, it's a game-changer.

    "As the new measurement technique neither has to absorb the photons to be measured nor amplify them, it is possible to directly detect the electromagnetic background noise of the vacuum and thus also the controlled deviations from this ground state, created by the researchers," explains a press release from the university.


    The study still has its limitations. At best, it merely represents our first foray into the something that mysteriously permeates the void. It's an encouraging first step, however; one that promises to peer deeper at the philosophical absurdities of existence than ever before.

    What is there to see when you squint into the heart of darkness? We may soon find out
  2. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    21 Jan '17 13:536 edits
    Can nothing be something?

    No else that would be a contradiction.
    according to quantum mechanics, even an empty vacuum is not really empty. It's filled with strange virtual particles that blink in and out of existence in timespans too short to observe


    You don't need quantum mechanics to know 'empty' vacuum is not 'nothing' even if empty vacuum hypothetically contains literally 'nothing' other than a quantity of dimensional space so that's even if hypothetically quantum mechanics was wrong and 'empty' vacuum hypothetically contained no virtual particles. Any 3D volume is 'something' because a 3D volume is a quantifiable amount of dimensional space and also note dimension is 'something'.
  3. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    21 Jan '17 17:43
    Originally posted by whodey
    http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/stories/physicists-may-have-just-manipulated-pure-nothingness

    It's one of those philosophical questions we occasionally ponder: What is nothing? Can nothing be something? If not, then how can something come from nothing?

    If there's one scientific field on the forefront of such conceptual paradoxes, it's ...[text shortened]... before.

    What is there to see when you squint into the heart of darkness? We may soon find out
    Except that the running of the coupling constants in the Standard Model have been observed in accelerator experiments and that depends on vacuum polarization. So I think that this is new in terms of methodology, but not in terms of what they've seen. The reporter didn't understand what they were saying probably.
  4. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    25 Jan '17 03:28
    There is just what is. Even mere pockets of nothing are so full of stuff, your i-phone overflows.

    'Nothing' makes sense only as an absence of something, but that still leaves everything else.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree