Originally posted by Suzianne This, from someone who thinks Rajk is a "reasonable Christian". The question still remains as to why he doesn't think the crucifixion or the resurrection has any "meaning" for him. Could be that's why you agree with him, too.
Your "characterization" of my comments is off-base and wholly without merit, [b]as usual.[/b]
I think your analysis of rajk and fmf are off-base ....as usual
Originally posted by Suzianne This, from someone who thinks Rajk is a "reasonable Christian". The question still remains as to why he doesn't think the crucifixion or the resurrection has any "meaning" for him.
So now you're claimung Rajk999 doesn't think the crucifixion or the resurrection have any "meaning?
Originally posted by FMF So now you're claimung Rajk999 doesn't think the crucifixion or the resurrection have any "meaning?
Christians will argue to the bitter end to support their church doctrine. If only they believed in the teachings of Christ, and argue for His teachings, what a great world this would be. Its a pity.
Originally posted by Rajk999 Christians will argue to the bitter end to support their church doctrine. If only they believed in the teachings of Christ, and argue for His teachings, what a great world this would be. Its a pity.
Christians, Jews and Muslims. Count the wars! The raped women, the butchered children, the ruined homes. Jesus does a little bit of healing and then dies and goes away, like he had no real power. It seems our future is up to us.
Originally posted by Rajk999 Christians will argue to the bitter end to support their church doctrine. If only they believed in the teachings of Christ, and argue for His teachings, what a great world this would be. Its a pity.
Again, you misrepresent, and assume, with no thought given to your own "beam". A Pharisee to the bitter end.