Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
I see you edited out the gay slur you originally included in your post. With your belonging to an organization that has bigoted attitudes towards homosexuals such as the Jehovah's Witnesses, it's not surprising that you wrote it originally. Your bigotry closes your mind and leaves you in ignorance.
You also seem to have a closed mind on the issue of th s likely that the number of victims that would sue the JWs would be low.
yawn, such a crashing bore.
you really should get your slurs from a more up to date and reputable source, you have already been made to look a horses a$$, i see you did not learn the first time, i must therefore refer you to this article.
A press release issued in 2003 by Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information stated: "The elders may be required by law to report even uncorroborated or unsubstantiated allegations to the authorities. If so, we expect the elders to comply."
The Watchtower magazine has outlined the following policy: "Depending on the law of the land where he lives, the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the State. The congregation will not protect him from this."
A 2002 memo to all congregations stated: "Our position is that secular authorities deal with crime while elders deal with sin." Even where there is no mandatory reporting requirement, victims or others having knowledge of an incident of sexual abuse must not be discouraged from reporting it.
source wikipedia
it makes your hijacking butt seem downright, so last century, please if you are going to try to slur and throw accusations around, make sure they are up to date. this is the third time your hijacking butt has tried to hijack my thread, all other attempts shall henceforth be ignored.
in the immortal words of buggs bunny, what an ultramaroon, what a nim-cow-poop, what a gull-a-bull, what an im-bess-il