Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Your debate with the atheist would probably be more fruitful if you didn't start from the false premise that he was 'spiritually blind.' (Or that he suffered from a malady from which he needed to be healed).
From the atheist's point of view, it is not that he 'can't see' but rather that there is nothing to see in the first place. Hardly a diagnosis for blindness.
While being called "spiritually blind" could be offensive I think you should consider this:
You have to use the RIGHT organ to substantiate certain things.
I cannot taste music because my tongue is not the right organ. What I need to do is use my ears.
I cannot smell the color blue or purple. The nose is marvelous. But the nose is not the proper organ to substantiate what
"BLUE" is or what
"PURPLE" is. Now if your EYES are used, the reality of the colors can be substantiated and experienced.
Do you agree up to here?
After you get over the initial sense of being slighted by being called "spiritually blind" you might consider just a little that we ALL come into this world in need of healing from a spiritual blindness.
But I understand the annoyance at being told this. I was offended when some Christian girl I was dating told me that I was "a lost sheep". I did not like this chick telling ME that I was a "lost sheep" just because I didn't believe in her God. If she wanted to introduce me to Christ she also seemed to get off to a very bad start.
Latter I did find out that that tackless, rude, blunt girl had told me the truth.
It turned out that I realized that I had indeed been like a "lost sheep" when Jesus came to me.
But a struggle ensued between the time I was called a "lost sheep" and the night I surrendered my heart to Jesus as Lord.