27 Sep '16 14:00>
Originally posted by whodeyExactly. So will you answer my questions or not?
Money given to help the poor does not necessarily mean they are giving money directly to the poor.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI never give money to roadside beggars because I believe it encourages begging. However, when giving to the poor who are not beggars then an argument can be made that they usually do know what is best and allowing them to make the choice on how to spend the money may be a good idea. I have often questioned charity organisations that spend a lot of money on staff and wondered whether or not it would be better to simply give all the money to the people being helped. I think that in reality there are cases where one way is better and cases where the other is better.
I have on occasion asked such individuals if I can get them anything from the bakery. (A sandwich or such). Although I agree with you to some extent that it is their responsibility how they spend the money (if you elect to give it to them) but by buying something for them I retain control of what that money is used for. (Perhaps this is for my own peace of mind that i am not helping to fuel a drug habit or the like).
Originally posted by twhiteheadYes, you are right to differentiate between 'street beggars' and the poor. (To begin with it is not always the case that beggars are poor or homeless etc). I wouldn't dream of telling someone on the poverty line how to spend what little money they do have. That's entirely their choice.
I never give money to roadside beggars because I believe it encourages begging. However, when giving to the poor who are not beggars then an argument can be made that they usually do know what is best and allowing them to make the choice on how to spend the money may be a good idea. I have often questioned charity organisations that spend a lot of money o ...[text shortened]... overnment to improve their social welfare system.
Also campaign for a universal basic income!
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI thought it was illegal to solicit for funds in this way if you are a charity? Its my understanding that Jehovahs Witnesses who are registered in the UK as a charity and who subsist on voluntary donations are not allowed to solicit for funds. If someone wishes to give a donation then that is something different but we are not allowed to solicit for them. If someone asks how much the literature that we offer costs we are instructed to state that it comes at no charge. Note there is a difference between saying that its free, its not free because we pay for the paper and ink and maintenance of huge printing facilities and transport etc etc but as far as the public is concerned it comes at no cost. Not a few times I have been talking to Muslims at their homes and they think that I have come for a donation, 'chunda', in Urdu because the Molvis (religious leaders) send out people to gather payments for their Islamic schools etc.
Yes, you are right to differentiate between 'street beggars' and the poor. (To begin with it is not always the case that beggars are poor or homeless etc). I wouldn't dream of telling someone on the poverty line how to spend what little money they do have. That's entirely their choice.
My pet hate are 'Chuggers' (Charity Muggers) who approach you ...[text shortened]... eople who need it). I really don't require a fee charging middleman in order to give to charity.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNot illegal old chap. I am accosted on an almost daily basis by these Charity workers (often numerous times in succession as they tend to operate in packs, spaced out slightly down the road). I think there might be some legal restrictions however on where they can stand.
I thought it was illegal to solicit for funds in this way if you are a charity? Its my understanding that Jehovahs Witnesses who are registered in the UK as a charity and who subsist on voluntary donations are not allowed to solicit for funds. If someone wishes to give a donation then that is something different but we are not allowed to solicit fo ...[text shortened]... e wants to donate 280 sterling for me to have them/fixed replaced that would be most charitable!
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukereally? hmmm, i will need to research this. One does not mind someone standing with a coin bucket in the supermarket, they are not soliciting, they are kind of just passively there and if you wish to donate you can and if you don't then you don't but people who wait to pounce on you and obtain your banking details that's different. I was reading that some of the companies used to procure donations were awarding themselves many of millions of pounds and this poisons the well for legitimate charities. I dunno what the solution is to be honest. I never used to give the Harikrishnas who were asking for donations money but on not a few occasions I bought them some groceries.
Not illegal old chap. I am accosted on an almost daily basis by these Charity workers (often numerous times in succession as they tend to operate in packs, spaced out slightly down the road). I think there might be some legal restrictions however on where they can stand.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you were down on your luck old chap I'd gladly give you an aubergine or two.
really? hmmm, i will need to research this. One does not mind someone standing with a coin bucket in the supermarket, they are not soliciting, they are kind of just passively there and if you wish to donate you can and if you don't then you don't but people who wait to pounce on you and obtain your banking details that's different. I was reading th ...[text shortened]... nas who were asking for donations money but on not a few occasions I bought them some groceries.
Originally posted by SuzianneSo, do you think you have ever given any money to alcoholic homeless people who then used it to buy booze instead of eating a square meal?
But I treat them all with respect. And when I do give someone money to buy food, I don't treat them like a child who can't be trusted with the money.