Published as The Law of the Jungle (Elephant Gambit) in [threadid]157047[/threadid] A couple of added comments and spellings corrected etc.
1. e4
My opponent is one of RHP's high volume fast turnaround players. We've played a few times and he has beaten me once where I, overconfident and a pawn up, missed a vital tactic and paid the price.
1... e5
Carving out a stake in the forest and elbow room for later maneuvers
2. Ng1f3 d5
Formerly called the Queen Pawn Counter Gambit, now the Elephant Gambit. Black offers a pawn so as to develop unimpeded by having to have a pawn on d6 and to gain a move while white captures the pawn. The risk is that White builds a dominant centre, consolidates and wins with an extra pawn.
3. d4
White does not buy into Black's view of reality and opens the centre for himself
3... dxe4
forcing White's hand by attacking the knight
4. Nf3xe5
White establishes his knight in the centre
4... Nb8d7
challenging the centralised knight
5. Bf1e2
Sensible if restrained, keeping Black's route to glory - the e file - blocked and preparing access to the stockade. (See the quoted forum thread for Greenpawn's rant about this move and where bishops should be in double King Pawn openings)
5... Ng8f6
Protecting e4
6. Ne5xd7
There was no necessity for this capture at this stage which wastes a move