@spruce112358 said
Ayn Rand was fine with society's first obligation - everyone behaving themselves. Everyone is fine with that one. But she rejected the second obligation - to help protect the rights of others.
Rand, anarchists, anarcho-capitalists, many libertarians, etc. often reject the second obligation - not in so many words, usually. But usually saying something like, "If my neig ...[text shortened]... efore that.
But Ayn Rand was bitter enough about communism (rightly so) that it made her extreme.
Yeah, a society of Marx sheep trumps lords and bears.
First you were saying last week that we have an obligation to protect each other’s rights. I questioned you on that, to explain, and you said that we do that by paying taxes, so everyone is universally protected. Oh, I said…OK, I guess that is the definition, for what it’s worth, I don’t know why you would even bother to write it.
But here , para 4, you go on about being burgled for instance. Those taxes that you said we are all pay would cover that, as our taxes pay for the police. So I still do not know what in the hell you are saying.
I really don’t. Like, why would you have to sit home with a shotgun if our tax has the police protecting you? You are not doing a good job of explaining yourself. Even the part about freedom I don’t get. After we pay taxes, and maintain a charitable lifestyle, do we have responsibility to protect the rights of others ? From whence this responsibility come?
I just don’t get it.
Are you per chance confusing this with empathy, one of Susanne and Sonhouse favorite subject? They think everyone is heathen that is a Republican or a conservative.