Originally posted by @lemondropsorting by gross points is already there
what's wrong with the clan that plays the most games being crowned champion?
providing that they also win the most games
it would be possible for a clan to lose every challenge and still earn top spot on the ladder
some might say this is wrong but I like it
it's games, not challenge wins, that count and that's the way it should be
my opinion for what it's worth
Originally posted by @mghrn55I don't think the losing clan in a gross points system should get zero point
I'll try to explain this to you in simple English.
2 clans agree to a 10 player challenge, i.e. 20 games.
One clan wins 11 games, the other wins 4.
5 games are still in progress.
The challenge points are only awarded once every game in the challenge is completed.
But the challenge has already been decided in favor of the clan with 11 wins.
Irregar ...[text shortened]... 5 games in either scoring system, net or gross, if they want the collect the points right away.
Originally posted by @roma45what's wrong with the clan that plays the most games being crowned champion?
Its not. Look back years ago at results.
It has always been challenge v challenge when ever any side won over 50% of the games it was over.
Numerous ideas were put forward including bonus points per each game won on top of who won the challenge.
Again this was not supported as it would just help the clans playing the most games.
Might not sound fair but ...[text shortened]... enough for me on the subject.
I will no doubt be back after tadger pathetically baits me again.
Originally posted by @very-rustyare you confessing to this brutal crime?
Lemon must be getting his info from Fox! 😛
Originally posted by @roma45gross points does make every game count because it is not based on winning the challenge but rather winning the most games, hence every game counts
Gross points don't make every game count.
A 10 v 10 in gross points is still 20 points to the winner no matter if its 20-0 or 11-9. Just no points taken off the losers
The system was changed to net it was meant to reward better quality chess not just a clan who could in theory lose more challenges than they win and be top.
The game dumping you are against ...[text shortened]... own the amount of challenges a clan can do.
Changing back to gross points will not change that.
Originally posted by @very-rustythe list of those regretting whatever is zero and VR is still not a suspect
Reports of VR'S cunning and physical strength have been vastly under estimated by many who regretted it afterwards.
Originally posted by @roma45gross points
Again you never answer a question .
I am happy with the current system
You want change so the ball is in your court.
Why is gross points better.
Remember it was your hero robbie that campaigned to get it changed to net points.
I actually agree with you on something but get a childish reply.
And you wonder why no one supports you.
Originally posted by @very-rustyVR was not suspected because the crime required cunning and physical strength
VR feels bad about not being one of the suspects.
Originally posted by @roma45take it to the complaint department spanky
I dont have a proposal.i play by the rules the site puts down. If i did not like them i would leave.
I want your opinion of tadgers idea. The dumbass was idiotic enough to put it on site ideas.....epic fail.
I do agree with what you said on another thread i have been saying it for years only ONE CLAN PER PLAYER.
Plus it should not be allowed for a clan to change its name unless there is a new leader
Originally posted by @padgerI have to agree with you on that
Well to be honest I think they are too stupid to realise I am just winding them up
So I will keep on for a bit longer
Originally posted by @lemondrophis lifeless body was found early this morning and ruled a homicide, Scotland is in mourning
breaking news, Robbie carrobie has been found, more details coming
Originally posted by @roma45I am a proponent of simply using gross points as the determining factor
The majority are one man challenges..which i have no problem with but tadger does.
Now can i please have your opinion on the tadgers site idea