Forum Search

Forum Search

Public Forums Only
Search by Author (Last month only)
Public forum posts since 23 Sep '20 .
Enter the exact name of the post author
  1. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    23 Oct '20 10:18
    Striking that Trump couldn't articulate a single policy proposal that would address the various issues and problems facing the country.

    He literally has no idea what to do.
  2. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    22 Oct '20 16:31
    @metal-brain said
    It is rare because there has not been much mail in early voting until now. Trump didn't say there was a lot of voter fraud. He basically said more mail voting had the potential to lead to a lot of election fraud. You cannot prove that wrong until after the election. Nobody can.

    https://nypost.com/2020/08/05/84000-mail-in-ballots-disqualified-in-nyc-primary-election/
    Did you read the last paragraph in my post?

    Trump is looking for excuses, nothing more.
  3. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    22 Oct '20 11:24
    @metal-brain said
    No, I'm not talking about that. Read the very first post of mine on this thread. I provided 2 links that prove election fraud. I'll add this too.

    https://censoredbyjack.com/watch?id=5f905c0ac9aefd1615a0f216
    No one ever claimed that there has never been a case of voter fraud in the United States, so your links prove very little. In reality, cases of voter fraud are rare:

    "HOW RARE IS VOTER FRAUD?

    Many researchers have focused on impersonation fraud, in which a voter pretends to be someone else at the polls, because such claims have been used by states to justify stricter voter ID laws.

    Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Law School who tracks such cases, identified only 31 impersonation incidents between 2000 and 2014 across the country, out of more than 1 billion ballots cast.

    Five states - Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah and Washington - hold their elections primarily by mail and have documented almost no cases of cheating. Oregon, for instance, has sent out more than 100 million mail ballots since 2000 and reported around a dozen cases of proven fraud."

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-voter-fraud-facts-explai/explainer-despite-trump-claims-voter-fraud-is-extremely-rare-here-is-how-u-s-states-keep-it-that-way-idUSKBN2601HG
  4. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    21 Oct '20 20:13
    @earl-of-trumps said
    @vivify 2) A notorious white supremacist group was invited and scheduled to attend.
    Clearly, this wasn't just about "free speech".


    Excuse me? what notorious white supremacist's group are you ever talking about?
    These guys:

    https://www.adl.org/proudboys
  5. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    21 Oct '20 20:07
    @athousandyoung said
    The Proud Boys are not White Supremacist. They are Western Male Chauvinist.
    Their founder Gavin McInnes said this:

    " I don't want our culture diluted. We need to close the borders now and let everyone assimilate to a Western, white, English-speaking way of life."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proud_Boys

    Kinda sounds "White Supremacist".
  6. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    21 Oct '20 02:29
    @earl-of-trumps said
    Get out of town, charlie brown.

    you're telling me that an african american talking about freedom of speech on the
    internet is going to be confused as a police brutality threat to afros???

    you're gone, man.
    You make the rally seem so innocuous, but the Proud Boys weren't going to be there to chat about "internet free speech". True, they didn't show up, but Anderson claimed they were going to:

    "But, his flier for the event featured prominent leaders of the Proud Boys, a hate group according to the Southern Poverty Law Center and mentioned in the first presidential debate."

    https://abc7news.com/free-speech-rally-san-francisco-proud-boys-tech-protest-un-plaza/7170949/

    Here's some of Phillip Anderson's rhetoric:

    "Philip Anderson, the organizer of yesterday’s rally in San Francisco and an admitted member of the Proud Boys, talking about “beating the living sh*t” out of anyone who opposes them."

    https://twitter.com/chadloder/status/1317911960143290368
  7. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    21 Oct '20 01:14
    @dood111 said
    That was a terrible miscarriage of justice.
    Here's another example (one of many):

    "Video from the following morning shows DiPenti driving by Ferrell’s house and Ferrell running out to confront and argue with him. Several hours later, DiPenti is seen walking in the street near Ferrell’s house, and Ferrell again goes outside to confront him. The two men are seen wrestling in the street.

    With DiPenti on top, Ferrell pulled a handgun, warned DiPenti that he was armed, and placed the gun against DiPenti’s head.

    Ferrell testified that he fired once, and only after DiPenti refused to get off him and reached for the gun. The fatal shot struck DiPenti in the chest."

    https://www.dispatch.com/news/20191021/jury-decides-shooting-during-street-fight-was-murder-not-self-defense
  8. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    21 Oct '20 01:06
    @dood111 said
    If it's not "the law" then why do people get exonerated when they use a gun to defend themselves against an attacker beating the snot out of them that is unarmed?
    I already explained this.

    ""The use of deadly force is only permissible where one is in imminent danger of death or serious injury."

    That's why Zimmerman had to dress up his story with claims that Martin said he was going to kill him and grabbed for the gun. Zimmerman was a cop wannabe and knew that merely losing a fight wouldn't be enough for a self-defense claim.

    BTW, why aren't you man enough to apologize for calling me a "liar"? And if that's too much for your ego, simply remove the offending post.
  9. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    21 Oct '20 00:59
    Did some research and found these facts:

    "San Francisco police say they made an arrest in the weekend assault of a Trump supporter and free speech rally organizer who lost two front teeth. San Francisco police said they arrested 35-year-old Adroa Anderson of Watsonville in Oakland on Sunday. "

    https://wsiltv.com/2020/10/20/san-francisco-police-arrest-man-in-assault-on-trump-backer/

    It seems to be this person:

    "Sheriff”s detectives arrested a 23-year-old man suspected of selling marijuana on Tuesday afternoon and seized loaded guns and almost $100,000 of suspected drug sales profits.

    The bust came after a two month investigation into pot sales, according to Sgt. Steve Carney, head of the Sheriff”s Office Narcotic Enforcement Team.

    Adroa Anderson of Santa Cruz was arrested on suspicion of possessing marijuana for sale and for being armed while possessing the drug for sale."

    https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/2008/10/30/sheriffs-detectives-arrest-live-oak-man-for-marijuana-sales-seize-loaded-guns-almost-100000/

    I checked Facebook and found an account with the same name that talks about being arrested and serving time for selling marijuana. There's no entries since October 2016 but he seems to be militantly anti-police and there are a few entries sympathetic to BLM though nothing indicating any link to that group. There is zero mention of Antifa.

    https://www.facebook.com/doggtown.dro/photos

    So as best as I can tell, he's a militant BLM sympathizer with a penchant for violence (which is not acceptable to that organization) but there's nothing to link him with any Antifa group or philosophy.
  10. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    20 Oct '20 18:24
    @dood111 said
    Are you seriously suggesting that at a conservative rally for free speech the Republican organizer was punched by another Republican?
    I don't know why he was punched. And all I know about the man who punched him in his name, age and city he lived in.

    If you have further verified info, please share.
  11. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    20 Oct '20 17:54
    @vivify said
    There was an arrest made of one Adora Anderson. Police have not revealed any information regarding possible political affilations so such speculation is premature.
  12. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    20 Oct '20 16:161 edit
    @dood111 said
    If you really are a lawyer, you must be a crummy one, because depending on the situation the law DOES agree with me.
    Remember Michael Brown? Unarmed.
    Trayvon Martin? Unarmed.
    There's countless cases of people shooting someone unarmed in self defense and getting off because they were being attacked and had no choice.
    That's already been explained.

    And your version isn't the law.
  13. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    20 Oct '20 14:22
    @dood111 said
    He didn't "get" into a fight, HE WAS ATTACKED.
    If someone bigger and stronger than you starts beating you mercilessly for no reason you certainly may use deadly force.
    The law doesn't agree with you. Get over it.

    And I'm still waiting for that apology and/or removal of your post.
  14. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    20 Oct '20 02:20
    @jimmac said
    "a reasonable belief", that is ok if you get it right, you die if you get it wrong.
    I do actually believe in the reasonable force clause but I feel many circumstances can exclude that. I have always said that in the event of a home invasion ( been happening here with some monotonous regularity ) I would use maximum force, ( we do not have guns ), inc knives, asap before aski ...[text shortened]... wn. I would not intend to kill but in the right situation, IF I had a gun, it may be the right move.
    State laws vary as to the use of deadly force to defend against a home invasion:

    "Typically, state laws can allow for the use of deadly physical force and it's legally presumed to be justified if an intruder is in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering a dwelling or residence."

    "There is a split amongst the states as to whether or not deadly force can be used. The majority of states hold that any degree of physical force, including deadly force, can be used by the occupant to protect against an invader. But there is a strong minority of states, including West Virginia, that requires a reasonable believe that the intruder intended to inflict serious bodily injury."

    https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/may-i-shoot-an-intruder.html
  15. Subscriberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    At the Bar
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    41113
    20 Oct '20 01:57
    @earl-of-trumps said
    Well then your numbers don't match up. Here is what you posted earlier:
    "The country has about 2 million privately owned guns in a nation of 8.3 million people."

    That's a little more than 4.1 people per gun. Now you are saying that only 28%
    of households have a gun! that does not jive at all.

    It sounds like almost all households would have a gun, unless ...[text shortened]... at's wrong? I'll let you figure out but
    again, you just love playing the artful dodger, don't you.
    BTW Earl your claim was:

    "Every household has a gun in Switzerland."

    Are you going to be the first right winger on this board to say "I was wrong"?
Back to Top

Search Site Content