Originally posted by Blackamp
let's say that that is the case. the next question might be: did the shows' producers and networks have a moral/social obligation to make their shows more inclusive, even at the expense of profit?
Fair question, Blackamp.
But this being the Culture Forum, I am more intrigued by these questions:
- why didn't the shows' producers and networks
want to make their shows more inclusive despite the profit differential?
- why, in the cases of the 4 shows I cited, did advertisers - who surely want to reach as many people as they can - prefer the sitcoms as they were and did not pressure the producers to create and package the ideas as more inclusive sitcoms?
- did those advertisers make more money by associating their products with
blackpeopleless sitcoms?
- what does it say about American society and culture if the seemingly reasonable answer to the question 'why does this material exclude black people?' is the question 'do the creators of the material have any other obligation apart from maximizing profit?'
Way more broadly: Is the desireability of an inclusive society always always always trumped by the profit motive, when and if that is the stark choice available?