Originally posted by reinfeld
the point of my question in brief is about the method of re-memory once something is memorized. does the musician actually "think" about the next sound or finger movement, etc. or does the memory just flow in a sort of subconscious way without having to actually "remember" the next thing to do ? is it like tossing a basketball without having to think abou ...[text shortened]... think in nano-seconds about what you are doing and what you will do next in a rational way ?
IMHO of classcal guitar, it isn't a re-memory once a piece is mastered. It becomes 'pure' instinct. That is to say, the movements of fingers, the whole piece layout, and what has to be done 'physically.'
I will not play a piece publicly, unless I know it inside out, upside down and backwards. What this 'DOES' allow, during a performance, is to go into oneself and go into depths of 'emotion' and 'expression' - i.e. I can take on my owns freedoms of moving my hands up and down the neck to create different depths of string sound - from mellow, near 12th fret, to high clicks near the bridge. I have the freedom to change finger plucking and 'therefore improvise', thus creating a unique piece. I create new sounds that are what I envisage at that moment.
There has to be instinctive memory somewhere, in order to be able to achieve this. That is when I would term a piece is 'mastered'. We often see technically mastered musicians, from the likes of China and Japan. BUT - they are technically accomplished only. There is no emotion or creativity - because, as I see it, they are concentrating on purely getting the piece out without a technical hitch. They have MASTERED nothing!! Maturity in age plays another MASSIVE distinctive part too! Experiences of pain and achievements in life come very much into the picture of personal musical expression! That is also memory, that can change a single note and make a piece or break it!!