22 May '09 07:08>
Originally posted by uzlessHowever, the original series defined what star trek is. It was a group of people racing around the galaxy shooting the crap out of all sort of ugly aliens and finding ever more polystyrene planets on which to lose another anonymous crew member. The main characters used to moan at each other in a friendly way and none of them needed a counselor to keep them morally smug and superior as they did in the god awful next generation.
The original series is kind of a joke by today's standards...in the same way that I dream of Jeannie, or Leave it to Beaver would be.
It's hard to compare shows from one era to shows in a different era though.
Don't get me wrong...the movie is decent and is better than any of the recent ones. My issue is with the degenerative downward spiral in dece ...[text shortened]... I just found it confusing and sad. Perhaps my moral compass is too far up Palynka's ass.
Personally I enjoyed the movie even though it is a load of nonsense. For me, it took me right back to the original series in feel and in the sense of adventure and discarded all the socio-babble of the last forty odd years. It was fun. It isn't supposed to be a great work of science fiction. It is just a typical family friendly adventure set in space.
So to say the movie wasn't a real star trek misses the point in my view. Somewhere in every television series or movie is a reference to "boldly go where no man (or "one" depending on level of political correctness) has gone before" which comes from the original star trek mission statement. Only the original series and Voyager actually paid any attention to that and Voyager gradually descended into the mushy vagueness that the rest suffered from after a while too.
By the way, I didn't feel Scotty was making fun of the weird alien thingy.
Jeez, I can't believe I cared enough about Star Trek to write all that!