12 Aug '08 19:28>
Originally posted by NordlysI bet they use batteries or need to be plugged in.
Oh yes, another advantage of e-books (one that I didn't think of because so far I don't have a problem reading small print).
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI think there is a time and a place for the kindle. I would have liked it when I was in college, they seem pretty good for travel. I like the newspaper delivery available. But for lesiure reading , I will keep the knockaround pbs.
Richard Cohen, a columnist for the Washington Post, laments the future passing of books, when they will one day be replaced by the Kindle, a device that lets readers download books. It's no longer a question of can we replace all books with computer text, but should we? I vote no.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-cohen_11edi.ART.State.Edition1.4d65683.html
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterJust think, once governments used to burn books to control public thought but now all they need is a really neat computer program to change them around a bit or delete them with one push of the button.
Richard Cohen, a columnist for the Washington Post, laments the future passing of books, when they will one day be replaced by the Kindle, a device that lets readers download books. It's no longer a question of can we replace all books with computer text, but should we? I vote no.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-cohen_11edi.ART.State.Edition1.4d65683.html
Originally posted by Pawn Qweenyes you can.
Agreed. ๐ And I like to read a book in bed, I can't do that with an ebook.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI vote no too, but they have to earn their own keep. Personally I find it
Richard Cohen, a columnist for the Washington Post, laments the future passing of books, when they will one day be replaced by the Kindle, a device that lets readers download books. It's no longer a question of can we replace all books with computer text, but should we? I vote no.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-cohen_11edi.ART.State.Edition1.4d65683.html
Originally posted by darvlayI like that too, except some books I keep in hard back and do not
As do I. I prefer to buy all my books used and in compact paperback form. They are cheaper, have more character and are better to lend to others (my friends have a hard time returning things). Plus, there's nothing more satisfying then finding a used book for a fraction of the price it would cost to buy new.
Newer releases of books, to me, seem far more oversized and overpriced then they used to/need to be.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI don't think books are going away anytime soon. Maybe 50-100 years from now, but too many people want them. Kind of like playing correspondence chess with post cards. It will go away one day, but it will die a very slow death.
Richard Cohen, a columnist for the Washington Post, laments the future passing of books, when they will one day be replaced by the Kindle, a device that lets readers download books. It's no longer a question of can we replace all books with computer text, but should we? I vote no.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-cohen_11edi.ART.State.Edition1.4d65683.html