Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. SubscriberWOLFE63
    Tra il dire e il far
    C'e di mezzo il mar!
    Joined
    06 Nov '15
    Moves
    22232
    23 May '18 13:01
    I'm certain Ronald Reagan would have had a clear response.
  2. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    23 May '18 14:001 edit
    I enable Putin. Do you know how? It is because I question the notion that Trump had Putin fix the election that he never wanted to win in the first place.

    Who the hell needs facts? I say Mueller should subpoena Trump's baker and milk man next, granted, Trump is not the focus of the investigation cuz it's Carter Page.

    Any day now.............
  3. SubscriberWOLFE63
    Tra il dire e il far
    C'e di mezzo il mar!
    Joined
    06 Nov '15
    Moves
    22232
    23 May '18 14:33
    Originally posted by @whodey
    I enable Putin. Do you know how? It is because I question the notion that Trump had Putin fix the election that he never wanted to win in the first place.

    Who the hell needs facts? I say Mueller should subpoena Trump's baker and milk man next, granted, Trump is not the focus of the investigation cuz it's Carter Page.

    Any day now.............
    Huh?
  4. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    14766
    23 May '18 14:35
    Originally posted by @wolfe63
    I'm certain Ronald Reagan would have had a clear response.
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired to rig elections.

    http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/36979-debbie-wasserman-schultz-resigns-in-disgrace-only-to-be-elevated-by-clinton-to-key-campaign-role

    We already have evidence of election meddling on the left. Where is your evidence that Russia was worse than them? We have the evidence right here in the USA of election meddling. Perhaps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
  5. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    81440
    23 May '18 14:36
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired ...[text shortened]... haps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
    EXACTLY!!!
  6. SubscriberWOLFE63
    Tra il dire e il far
    C'e di mezzo il mar!
    Joined
    06 Nov '15
    Moves
    22232
    23 May '18 14:39
    19 indictments and counting. 😀

    Stay tuned sports fans.
  7. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    14766
    23 May '18 14:56
    Originally posted by @wolfe63
    19 indictments and counting. 😀

    Stay tuned sports fans.
    That means nothing. Did anyone flip on Bill Clinton?
    The CIA admits to election meddling.

    YouTube

    For a good cause. In other words, good intentions. Remember what the road to hell is paved with? All countries justify it that way, including the Vatican.
  8. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39965
    23 May '18 14:57
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired ...[text shortened]... haps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
    "No evidence of Russian collusion"?:

    On January 6, 2017, the U.S. intelligence community issued a report that showed there were two campaigns to elect Donald Trump: one run by Trump and one run by the Russian government. Trump and many of his senior advisors and close associates have repeatedly denied any connections between the two campaigns, despite the fact that they were working towards the same goal, at the same time, and utilizing the same tactics.

    Yet over the past year, we’ve learned about a series of meetings and contacts between individuals linked to the Russian government and Trump’s campaign and transition team. In total, we have learned of 75 contacts between Trump’s team and Russia linked operatives, including at least 22 meetings. And we know that at least 22 high-ranking campaign officials and Trump advisors were aware of contacts with Russia-linked operatives during the campaign and transition. None of these contacts were ever reported to the proper authorities. Instead, the Trump team tried to cover up every single one of them.

    https://themoscowproject.org/explainers/trumps-russia-cover-up-by-the-numbers-70-contacts-with-russia-linked-operatives/

    There's nice detailed lists of the 75 contacts and 22 Trump campaign officials who either directly colluded with Russians or who knew about that collusion.
  9. Standard membershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    56379
    23 May '18 15:43
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired ...[text shortened]... haps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
    Yeah, no... I’m pretty sure you’re inaccurate over the meddling.

    And I don’t understand why republicants keep parrying this with rubbish about Clinton.
    Yeah, she’s a bitch, she’s nasty and I’m pretty sure there are scandals surrounding her which are true.

    But... no, let me rephrase that... BUT... she’s past tense. She’s not the one currently flushing your country down the toilet.

    Focussing on her is like having a debate on abortion and constantly parrying the debate with: “Mussolini hated penguins.”
  10. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    23 May '18 16:37
    Originally posted by @wolfe63
    19 indictments and counting. 😀

    Stay tuned sports fans.
    Any day now.......
  11. Joined
    07 Feb '09
    Moves
    138652
    23 May '18 16:46
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired ...[text shortened]... haps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
    Too bad Donald keeps pouring gasoline all over himself !! 🙄
  12. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    23 May '18 17:04
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired ...[text shortened]... haps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
    Trump himself has said he colluded with Russia, and there are many administration officials known to have been in direct contact with the Kremlin, including Trump Jr and high-ranking administration and transition officials. Perhaps you should consider watching a bit less Russia Today?
  13. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    23 May '18 18:393 edits
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    "No evidence of Russian collusion"?:

    On January 6, 2017, the U.S. intelligence community issued a report that showed there were two campaigns to elect Donald Trump: one run by Trump and one run by the Russian government. Trump and many of his senior advisors and close associates have repeatedly denied any connections between the two campaigns, despit ...[text shortened]... campaign officials who either directly colluded with Russians or who knew about that collusion.
    Is meddling in foreign elections a impeachable offense?

    If so, should Obama have been impeached for this meddling abroad in other countries elections?

    https://spectator.org/obamas-meddling-in-foreign-elections-six-examples/

    Or how about Obama trying to influence the primary elections in his own party by sending his goons to Bill Clinton to pay off the opposition to drop out?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/28/AR2010052802330.html

    Or what about Hillary colluding with the Ukrainian government to win the election?

    https://thinkamericana.com/2017/07/11/team-hillary-colluded-ukraine-hannity-wheres-outrage-video/

    Let me guess, you don't give a damn, which is more than I can say about the witch hunt in question.

    Hypocrite is too nice a term for people like yourself.
  14. SubscriberWOLFE63
    Tra il dire e il far
    C'e di mezzo il mar!
    Joined
    06 Nov '15
    Moves
    22232
    23 May '18 19:56
    Originally posted by @whodey
    Is meddling in foreign elections a impeachable offense?

    If so, should Obama have been impeached for this meddling abroad in other countries elections?

    https://spectator.org/obamas-meddling-in-foreign-elections-six-examples/

    Or how about Obama trying to influence the primary elections in his own party by sending his goons to Bill Clinton to pay off t ...[text shortened]... say about the witch hunt in question.

    Hypocrite is too nice a term for people like yourself.
    whodey...please....don't.

    Don't start posting way-too-lengthy deceptions with links to articles no one will read ala Duchess64. It's beneath you.

    I don't agree with 90% of your drivel...but if you devolve...the entertainment you provide would be forever lost. 🙁
  15. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35854
    23 May '18 20:10
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    There is no evidence of Russia collusion. However, there is evidence of Donna Brazile leaking debate questions to Hitlery.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/donna-brazile-is-totally-not-sorry-for-leaking-cnn-debate-questions-to-hillary-clinton/?utm_term=.f0131a34bcfb

    There is also evidence Debbie Wassermen Shultz conspired ...[text shortened]... haps the Russia story is just a method of distracting Americans from the real election meddling.
    Trump was elected because up to 7 million people of color were removed from voting rolls across 26 states in 2016, a month before the election, which left them unable to re-register in time. Kris Kobach has (or had) the lists of names he shopped around to election officials during the summer before the election. Names like Washington, Hernandez and Kim.

    That's the real election meddling, and there's evidence that the GOP is going to run the same gambit every major election from now on.

    I hope I'm wrong, and 2016 was a one-off, but now that the Trump crime family is installed in the White House, I'm not hopeful.
Back to Top