@Mott-The-Hoople saidI've probably posted this at least a dozen times here, but Chicago's "strict gun laws", which amounted to a virtual ban of private ownership of handguns, was struck down by the SCOTUS 15 years ago. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/supreme-court-strikes-down-chicagos-30-year-old-handgun-ban
the same way chicago reduced its killing with strict gun laws?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidBanning immigrants
who here actually thinks this would solve the problem?
who thinks it is possible to ban guns and no one would have guns?
Banning drugs
Who here thinks this would solve the problem?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt will reduce the number of gun related deaths. Certainly in the long run.
who here actually thinks this would solve the problem?
who thinks it is possible to ban guns and no one would have guns?
@shavixmir saidAnd increase other methods such as knives will increase (London as example). Killers are going to kill.
It will reduce the number of gun related deaths. Certainly in the long run.
Why do you libs never consider the WHY are the people killing?
@AThousandYoung saidThanks for PROVING banning doesnt work.
Banning immigrants
Banning drugs
Who here thinks this would solve the problem?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWhy are we spending so much money to block immigration and drug use, then?
Thanks for PROVING banning doesnt work.
@wildgrass saidBecause they are not a constitutional right
Why are we spending so much money to block immigration and drug use, then?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidBut banning doesn't work, right? You wrote that..
Because they are not a constitutional right