@AThousandYoung saidGo play with your ding a ling you seem proud of, It’s like the mighty Christian advertising her isle of misfit toys???
Stop white knighting Metal Brain you simp
@Metal-Brain said
Hannah Poling received money from the vaccine court for her autism. But you don't want to believe that and call it known propaganda.
https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2738&context=faculty_scholarship
As highlighted by several scientists, the Hannah Poling case does not
show that vaccines cause autism generally. The evidence pointed
to a preexisting mitochondrial disorder caused by a mutation in a
specific gene.
@AThousandYoung saidWhat is the link, and ha ha
No, Suzi doesn't provide a link to help people understand her choice of forum title Rain Man
tinyurl.com/bdcy27ph
@AThousandYoung saidYeah, so the "vaccine" court payed for it anyway. LOL!https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2738&context=faculty_scholarship
As highlighted by several scientists, the Hannah Poling case does not
show that vaccines cause autism generally. The evidence pointed
to a preexisting mitochondrial disorder caused by a mutation in a
specific gene.
So why isn't the vaccine court been found guilty of using vaccine court money for non vaccine conditions? Because it was caused by a vaccine and they don't want to admit it so they use double speak. The government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
What is the difference between cause and resulted? Nothing. Cause leads to result. Get duped by double speak much? The vaccine court payed for vaccine caused autism and they don't want to admit it....hence the double speak.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublespeak
When I punched you in the nose I didn't cause your nose to break. Your broken nose just resulted from it. LOL!
@AThousandYoung saidYou are ignoring one important inescapable fact, the vaccine court paid for her autism. That is a tacit admission the vaccine caused Hannah Poling's autism.https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2738&context=faculty_scholarship
As highlighted by several scientists, the Hannah Poling case does not
show that vaccines cause autism generally. The evidence pointed
to a preexisting mitochondrial disorder caused by a mutation in a
specific gene.
Why did the vaccine court pay for autism if the vaccine never caused it?
The American taxpayer is funding vaccine injuries that do not exist? Don't you feel ripped off if you honestly think that is true?
Cause and resulted from is the same thing. Only people in denial think otherwise. If you got raped in prison did he cause you rectal bleeding? No, it is just the result of the butt sex. Make sense? Any moron can see through that BS except those that don't want to believe it.
The Hannah Poling case proves vaccines cause autism. Unless you want to say your rapist did not cause your anal bleeding and your anal bleeding was just the result of rape. Down with that?
@AThousandYoung saidRT is a reliable source, but feel free to prove the source wrong if you can. But you cannot which is exactly why you attack the source and not the info contained. A common cheap tactic that is dishonest.
Spamming lots of sources leading with a known propaganda outlet like RT should be ignored because of Brandolini’s Law. If you want people to take you seriously stop spamming the forum with Jimmy Dore and RT garbage. Hiding a respectable source deep in your post does not make your posts worthy of respect.
Can you prove RT wrong? Why not? Since you have failed to do that RT is still proving they are a reliable source. But here is another source showing the video of Kirk's chief of staff abandoning him after he got shot.
https://rumble.com/v70o85u-mind-blowing-video-of-charlie-kirks-chief-of-staff-after-shooting.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
If your buddy got shot would you just walk away like Mikey did? I suppose you are going to make up excuses for Mikey. He couldn't stand the sight of blood or something stupid like that, right? Anything but a conspiracy to kill him.
If anybody has a right to be a conspiracy theorist it is Bobby Kennedy. His uncle was assassinated and then his father was. The only people who call bobby a conspiracy theorist and use the word as a pejorative are ....well.....nutjobs. Sirhan did not fire the shot that killed his father. It is not a conspiracy theory either. Look into it. How many shots were fired and how many did Sirhan fire? You can do basic math, right? Or are you going to call indisputable basic math a conspiracy theory like sonhouse did on the science forum? Is that the trend now?
@Metal-Brain saidWhat a colossal gullible fool.
RT is a reliable source, but feel free to prove the source wrong if you can. But you cannot which is exactly why you attack the source and not the info contained. A common cheap tactic that is dishonest.
Can you prove RT wrong? Why not? Since you have failed to do that RT is still proving they are a reliable source. But here is another source showing the video of Kirk' ...[text shortened]... utable basic math a conspiracy theory like sonhouse did on the science forum? Is that the trend now?