Originally posted by divegeester
It is not dodging to answer you the way I did.
You asked if I endorse this supposed prediction, (not a direct quote of course, as far as I know - this is how the media confuse the public and you are typical of those foolish enough to accept the way they distort and distract from real issues) and I replied that I do not make predictions, which is your answer.
As I have said in earlier posts (not this thread but on this topic) the attempt to represent elections as a sort of dog race, in which voters are asked to bet on a winner, is typical of the methods used to silence serious political discussion and generate a noisy substitute for real democracy.
You seem to have the delusions (among other delusions) that a) others are obliged to accept your demands for a debate and b) others have to accept the way you wish to frame it.
You are in fact trolling.
When a substantial topic is discussed you are incapable of engaging with it, because you are not well informed. There is no special pleasure to be had in proving you wrong over and over, bearing in mind you lack the capacity to appreciate when you have been proved wrong. It is sometimes useful to refute the nonsense you submit to the forum, but it is for us to decide when to bother, not comply with your demands.
As you are unable to argue on substance, instead you rely on a repertoire of tactics to maintain your irritating presence here, the written equivalent of rattling an empty tin can.
Your delighted post "Dodge noted" is most unimpressive. Telling you to STFU is not a dodge.