Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    06 Apr '17 14:372 edits
    https://pjmedia.com/blog/the-new-pecking-order-muslims-over-gays/

    Last month, when Marine Le Pen refused to put on a headscarf for a meeting with Lebanon's “Grand Mufti,” a friend of mine, whom I'll call Dave, commended her for it on Facebook. Dave, as it happens, is a Manhattan liberal who voted for Hillary Clinton, despises Donald Trump, and thinks Le Pen is a fascist. But he's also a gay man who's very clear-eyed about the danger of Islam, especially to gay people, and who is angry at the left, both in the U.S. and Europe, for appeasing the Religion of Peace. And so he gave Le Pen a thumbs-up for her gutsy action.

    Since Dave's own friends list consists almost exclusively of other big-city liberal types, he was immediately savaged for his post on Le Pen. One of them wrote that just because Muslim women decide to cover their hair or body doesn't mean they're oppressed, and added that Le Pen, by refusing to wear a headscarf, wasn't standing up for women but simply “trying to spread hate” towards Islam. Another of Dave's friends agreed: Le Pen “didn't behave properly.” So did another: “This woman is not a feminist, she is a fa[s]cist.” Several more comments were along the same lines. Many of Dave's friends were livid at him for even daring to compliment Le Pen and criticize Islam.

    In response to his friends' complaints, Dave tried to play the gay-rights card, explaining to them that if they accepted the Muslim rule that women need to don a veil to meet a mufti or enter a mosque, they also had to accept the Muslim requirement that gay people – people such as himself – be stoned to death. Plainly, Dave expected that this argument would win the day with his oh-so-liberal, oh-so-gay-friendly friends. But it didn't. On the contrary, their responses made it clear that they'd fully accepted the current progressive pecking order among officially recognized oppressed groups: gays (especially affluent gay American males such as Dave) are at the bottom of the ladder; Muslims are at the very top. Which means that when gays criticize Islam, a decent progressive is supposed to scream “Islamophobe"; but when Muslims drop gays to their deaths off the roofs of buildings, one is expected to look away and change the topic.

    Of course, plenty of gays don't share Dave's critical attitude toward Islam. They've bought into the idea that they and Muslims are fellow members of the oppression brigade. Either they're unaware that sharia law prescribes execution for gays and that a large majority of Western Muslims are totally okay with that, or they've allowed themselves to be convinced that Muslims today don't care any more about Islamic law than most Christians or Jews do about Leviticus. Or, even more worrisome, they've worked out some Orwellian way of knowing the truth while at the same time not knowing it. So it is that we end up seeing grotesquely absurd pictures of gay people waving banners that decry Islamophobia or that declare gay solidarity with Palestine.
  2. Standard memberSleepyguy
    Reepy Rastardly Guy
    Dustbin of history
    Joined
    13 Apr '07
    Moves
    12727
    06 Apr '17 14:47
    Wait wait wait.

    You have a friend?
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    06 Apr '17 15:001 edit
    Originally posted by Sleepyguy
    Wait wait wait.

    You have a friend?
    Heaven forbid!

    No silly it's just an article I read.

    Geesh.
  4. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    06 Apr '17 15:03
    Is there something you'd like to discuss, or is this just another of your old and tired Muslim-bashing threads, whodey?
  5. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    06 Apr '17 15:151 edit
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    Is there something you'd like to discuss, or is this just another of your old and tired Muslim-bashing threads, whodey?
    Islam now rules the DNC. They almost voted one to the top of the DNC.

    Gays have now been shuffled down to the bottom.

    It is no longer PC to criticize Muslims or their religion in any way, even if it is at the cost of offending or putting at risk gays.
  6. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    06 Apr '17 15:45
    Originally posted by whodey
    Islam now rules the DNC. They almost voted one to the top of the DNC.

    Gays have now been shuffled down to the bottom.

    It is no longer PC to criticize Muslims or their religion in any way, even if it is at the cost of offending or putting at risk gays.
    Right. So your answers are "no" and "yes" respectively.
  7. Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    06 Apr '17 15:48
    Originally posted by whodey
    Islam now rules the DNC. They almost voted one to the top of the DNC.

    Gays have now been shuffled down to the bottom.

    It is no longer PC to criticize Muslims or their religion in any way, even if it is at the cost of offending or putting at risk gays.
    I still don't understand why gays haven't abandoned the Dims party. Indeed they are confused or don't believe their destiny in the Muslim world.
  8. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    06 Apr '17 15:58
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    I still don't understand why gays haven't abandoned the Dims party. Indeed they are confused or don't believe their destiny in the Muslim world.
    I do.

    The faithful are still ingesting the cool aid.
  9. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    06 Apr '17 16:022 edits
    Originally posted by whodey
    https://pjmedia.com/blog/the-new-pecking-order-muslims-over-gays/

    Last month, when Marine Le Pen refused to put on a headscarf for a meeting with Lebanon's “Grand Mufti,” a friend of mine, whom I'll call Dave, commended her for it on Facebook. Dave, as it happens, is a Manhattan liberal who voted for Hillary Clinton, despises Donald Trump, and thinks Le Pe ...[text shortened]... gay people waving banners that decry Islamophobia or that declare gay solidarity with Palestine.
    I don't discriminate against Christians either. I guess this means I have to stone some gays.
  10. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    06 Apr '17 16:14
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    I still don't understand why gays haven't abandoned the Dims party. Indeed they are confused or don't believe their destiny in the Muslim world.
    Whatever reason could gays have to prefer a party platform that offers wishy-washy support for gay rights over a party that opposes them?
  11. Subscriberkmax87
    Land of Free
    Health and Education
    Joined
    09 Oct '04
    Moves
    82268
    06 Apr '17 16:19
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    I still don't understand why gays haven't abandoned the Dims party. Indeed they are confused or don't believe their destiny in the Muslim world.
    Yes gays are much better off supporting far right candidates because we all know how badly the alt right want to affirm the rights of the LGBT community.
  12. Subscriberkmax87
    Land of Free
    Health and Education
    Joined
    09 Oct '04
    Moves
    82268
    06 Apr '17 16:22
    Originally posted by kmax87
    Yes gays are much better off supporting far right candidates because we all know how badly the alt right want to affirm the rights of the LGBT community.
    As far as I've heard gay rights are some of the most important family values that the right side of American politics wants to affirm at every level in the body politic.
  13. Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    06 Apr '17 16:30
    Originally posted by kmax87
    Yes gays are much better off supporting far right candidates because we all know how badly the alt right want to affirm the rights of the LGBT community.
    Yes, but as the OP says, they are at the bottom of the food chain in their party. At the top is a religion that wants to behead them. Duh... not too hard to figure out.
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52855
    06 Apr '17 16:351 edit
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    Yes, but as the OP says, they are at the bottom of the food chain in their party. At the top is a religion that wants to behead them. Duh... not too hard to figure out.
    It just goes to show you BOTH religions suck. Both religions are the scourge of humankind.
  15. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    06 Apr '17 17:02
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    It just goes to show you BOTH religions suck. Both religions are the scourge of humankind.
    Gee I dunno the irreligious have been pretty scourgey too you know.
Back to Top