Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    05 Apr '17 02:141 edit
    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39499364

    The UN Security Council is to hold emergency talks after a suspected chemical attack in Syria left dozens of civilians dead and wounded.

    The attack on a rebel-held town brought furious international reaction, with the US and other powers blaming the Syrian government for the deaths.
    Officials in Damascus deny using any such weapons.
    The attack will overshadow a conference in Brussels at which 70 donor nations will discuss aid efforts in Syria.

    Delegates want to step up humanitarian access for thousands of civilians trapped by fighting.
    Syria's civil war has raged for more than six years with still no political solution in sight.
    Nearly five million Syrians have fled the country and more than six million are internally displaced, the UN says. More than 250,000 people have been killed.

    Wednesday's emergency meeting of the UN Security Council was called by France and the UK as international outrage mounted over the suspected gas attack on Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province on Tuesday.
  2. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    iEn guardia, Ingles!
    tinyurl.com/y43jqfyd
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    05 Apr '17 02:16
    Putin says 'nyet'.
  3. SubscriberPonderableonline
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    527670
    05 Apr '17 14:10
    Actually we can expect that there is done nothing beyond talking 🙁
  4. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    05 Apr '17 14:16
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    Actually we can expect that there is done nothing beyond talking 🙁
    I think Putin and Assad should be impeached!

    Yep, just talk, just like US politics in general.
  5. Standard memberfinnegan
    GENS UNA SUMUS
    To the Left
    Joined
    25 Jun '06
    Moves
    64930
    06 Apr '17 22:51
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    Actually we can expect that there is done nothing beyond talking 🙁
    We can expect no serious investigation of the claimed chemical attack and who is responsible and what are the circumstances. Just the usual kneejerk OMG. So easy to manipulate opinion. So impossible to set serious standards of evidence.
  6. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    06 Apr '17 22:59
    It makes little sense why Assad would jeopardize his position by inciting the international community against him when he is in a much stronger position than he was.
  7. Subscriberkmax87
    Land of Free
    Health and Education
    Joined
    09 Oct '04
    Moves
    82196
    06 Apr '17 23:08
    Originally posted by whodey
    I think Putin and Assad should be impeached!

    Yep, just talk, just like US politics in general.
    Well the Prez has bigger fish to fry, making sure his pal Billo the Clown gets all the support his influence deserves...
  8. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    06 Apr '17 23:33
    Originally posted by kmax87
    Well the Prez has bigger fish to fry, making sure his pal Billo the Clown gets all the support his influence deserves...
    How do we even know that Assad used them? Could ISIS have done it with the thought of dragging the US into a show down with Putin?

    If not, then did Putin have Assad use them to try and drag the US into the mire for some unsavory plot?

    I reckon the US is the only country allowed to use WMD's.
  9. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    06 Apr '17 23:41
    At some point the UN will find a US Presidential stooge who will take out Assad just like the they used Obama to take out Gaddafi.

    With Putin in the mix, it probably will not turn out as well, and that is with a dead US ambassador and Libya that is now an ISIS stronghold.

    Trump would have to be nuts to take out Assad.
  10. Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    07 Apr '17 02:14
    Originally posted by whodey
    At some point the UN will find a US Presidential stooge who will take out Assad just like the they used Obama to take out Gaddafi.

    With Putin in the mix, it probably will not turn out as well, and that is with a dead US ambassador and Libya that is now an ISIS stronghold.

    Trump would have to be nuts to take out Assad.
    Well, he did.
  11. Joined
    15 Dec '03
    Moves
    281373
    07 Apr '17 03:26
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    It makes little sense why Assad would jeopardize his position by inciting the international community against him when he is in a much stronger position than he was.
    My thoughts exactly. No proof. Syria could have hit a rebel gas storage facility. The US militay brass and the bankers (military/industrial complex) are creaming their jeans right now. I think it's also a message to Russia, China, N. Korea, Iran, et al. Trump may start www3 yet.
  12. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    07 Apr '17 04:26
    Originally posted by kquinn909
    My thoughts exactly. No proof. Syria could have hit a rebel gas storage facility. The US militay brass and the bankers (military/industrial complex) are creaming their jeans right now. I think it's also a message to Russia, China, N. Korea, Iran, et al. Trump may start www3 yet.
    HRC was calling for military strikes, too. Good to see such a spirit of bi-partisanship as far as reckless foreign adventurism goes.
  13. Standard memberLundos
    Back to basics
    About
    Joined
    11 Dec '04
    Moves
    68866
    07 Apr '17 05:04
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    HRC was calling for military strikes, too. Good to see such a spirit of bi-partisanship as far as reckless foreign adventurism goes.
    Ha!
  14. Standard memberfinnegan
    GENS UNA SUMUS
    To the Left
    Joined
    25 Jun '06
    Moves
    64930
    07 Apr '17 09:451 edit
    https://www.juancole.com/2017/04/washingtons-hypocrisy-chemical.html

    The USA broke international law when it attacked Syria.

    The law is incredibly flexible when it comes to justifying the unjustifiable, so when it is utterly flouted, one has to wonder why.

    If the concern with International Law is to be credible, you would first need to identify some degree of consistency.

    We know that the USA does not respect international law, so that is a concern.

    We also know that the UK and US are currently arming and training the Saudi Air Force, as they engage in an absolutely brutal terror campaign against Yemen. The UK and US support and finance the illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories. The recent bombing attack on Mosul killed 200 civilians.

    Where is the consistency again?
  15. Standard membershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    56261
    07 Apr '17 10:03
    Ooooooohhhhhh... someone's poking the bear and I reckon it will be like waving an orange wig in front of an angry bull...

    or something like that.

    Well there ain't no time to wonder why
    Whoopee! we're all gonna die.
    Well, come on generals, let's move fast;
    Your big chance has come at last.
    Now you can go out and get those reds
    'Cause the only good commie is the one that's dead
    And you know that peace can only be won
    When we've blown 'em all to kingdom come.
    And it's one, two, three,
Back to Top