From the link below:
"The FDA proposed releasing the documents on a rolling basis of 500 pages per month.
That means it would be just under 55 YEARS before the FDA released all 329,000 pages of documents it used to approve the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
Somehow, they could properly review these documents to approve a new vaccine in a matter of months, but it would take 55 years to review them to release to the public."
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-12-04/fda-wants-55-years-release-vaccine-approval-documents
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidMORE FAKE NEWS
From the link below:
"The FDA proposed releasing the documents on a rolling basis of 500 pages per month.
That means it would be just under 55 YEARS before the FDA released all 329,000 pages of documents it used to approve the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
Somehow, they could properly review these documents to approve a new vaccine in a matter of months, but it would tak ...[text shortened]... "
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-12-04/fda-wants-55-years-release-vaccine-approval-documents
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/
@jimm619 saidMore fake news from an opinion piece that was discredited.
MORE FAKE NEWS
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/
https://principia-scientific.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-fails-psi-fact-check/
https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest
@Metal-Brain
Those CRETINS. Maybe they should all be kicked out of office and TRUMP reinstated like you ultrarightwingnuts want, I'm SURE he would do a MUCH better job than Biden EVER could do........
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidJust close your mind....
More fake news from an opinion piece that was discredited.
https://principia-scientific.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-fails-psi-fact-check/
https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest
Media
The credibility website/media source is not determined by who owns them but rather by their track record. Everybody starts as a beginner and, through experience, becomes an authority in their field. MBFC is no different. Over the last 5+ years, we have proven to be a trusted authority on the rating of bias and the credibility of media sources. For example, MBFC is trusted by major media outlets and IFCN fact-checkers. This is evidenced by frequently being referenced by sources such as USA Today, Reuters Fact Check, Science Feedback, Washington Post, and NPR, among dozens of others. We are also frequently used as a resource in libraries, high schools, and universities across the United States.
Media Bias/Fact Check has also been used as a resource for research by the University of Michigan and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Further, we have been utilized by numerous print books such as these:
The Rise of the Alt-Right
Fake News, Propaganda, and Plain Old Lies: Find Trustworthy Information in the Digital Age
Raising Humans in a Digital World
Everyday Media Literacy An Analog Guide for Your Digital Life
Hate Groups and Extremist Organizations in America: An Encyclopedia
Finally, MBFC scored a perfect 100/100 rating by Newsguard, which rates the credibility of Media Sources. We believe it is significant that a competitor gave us this score.
About Dave Van Zandt
Dave Van Zandt is a registered Non-Affiliated voter who values evidence-based reporting. Since High School (a long time ago), Dave has been interested in politics and noticed as a kid the same newspaper report in two different papers was very different in their tone. This curiosity led him to pursue a Communications Degree in college; however, like most 20-year olds he didn’t know what he wanted and changed to a Physiology major midstream. Dave has worked in the healthcare industry since graduating from college but never lost the desire to learn more about bias and its impacts.
The combination of being fascinated by politics, a keen eye to spot bias before he even knew what it was called, and an education/career in science gave Dave the tools required for understanding Media Bias and its implications. This led to a 20-year journey where Dave would read anything and everything he could find on media bias and linguistics. He also employed the scientific method in the development of a methodology to support his assessments.
After years of people telling him to launch a website, in late 2015, Mediabiasfactcheck.com was born from a combination of many different experiences and exhaustive research. For the last 5+ years, Dave and his team have refined their methods and improved their reviews to the point where the website receives consistent high traffic levels and is considered a top authority in rating media bias and credibility.
The Team
Dave Van Zandt – Editor/Owner
Mike Crowe – Extensions – Filtered Search – Factual Search – API (Mike creates all of our cool tools for free. Please send him some love by donating to him.) Donate directly to Mike.
Aaron O’Leary – Writer/Contributor
Karen O’Connor Rubsam – Writer/Contributor
Kenneth White – Writer/Contributor
Jim Fowler – Writer/Contributor
Dennis Kelley – Research
Michael Allen – Research
McKenzie Huitsing – Research
And all the people who submit sources and question our ratings. Your feedback is vital.
Learn more on our Frequently Asked Questions Page.
Please submit questions and concerns to: editor@mediabiasfactcheck.com
Video Advertisement
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
NFN-Low Biased Factual News
Recently Added Sources or Pages
NE Kansas News
December 5, 2021
WAVE – Louisville News
December 5, 2021
WVAH – Charleston News
December 4, 2021
The Honest Patriot
December 3, 2021
KGPE – Fresno News
December 3, 2021
KSEE – Fresno News
December 3, 2021
Patriot Fetch
December 2, 2021
NC Kansas News
December 1, 2021
Today’s Top Page Views
Media Bias/Fact Check News
Least Biased
The Hill
Fox News (foxnews.com)
CNN
Brownstone Institute
The Guardian
The Epoch Times
The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 12/04/2021
Right Bias
Recently Updated Pages
True Activist - December 5, 2021
The Mind Unleashed - December 5, 2021
Membership Levels - December 5, 2021
Questionable Sources - December 5, 2021
NE Kansas News - December 5, 2021
Borowitz Report - December 5, 2021
Least Biased - December 5, 2021
WAVE – Louisville News - December 5, 2021
Right-Center Bias - December 4, 2021
WVAH – Charleston News - December 4, 2021
Subscribe via Email
Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email. For Ad-Free Subscriptions go here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/membership-account/membership-levels/
Join 21,566 other subscribers
Email Address
@jimm619 saidDave Van Zandt owns mediabiasfactcheck.
Just close your mind....
Media
The credibility website/media source is not determined by who owns them but rather by their track record. Everybody starts as a beginner and, through experience, becomes an authority in their field. MBFC is no different. Over the last 5+ years, we have proven to be a trusted authority on the rating of bias and the credibility of media sources ...[text shortened]... actcheck.com/membership-account/membership-levels/
Join 21,566 other subscribers
Email Address
What are Dave Van Zandt’s qualifications?
He works in the health care industry.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidAnd?
Dave Van Zandt owns mediabiasfactcheck.
What are Dave Van Zandt’s qualifications?
He works in the health care industry.
''.......don't need a weatherman to know which the wind blows...''
Be my guest...Look up zero hedge
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2020/04/12/the-10-best-fact-checking-websites-for-2020
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain said---------READ---------
From the link below:
"The FDA proposed releasing the documents on a rolling basis of 500 pages per month.
That means it would be just under 55 YEARS before the FDA released all 329,000 pages of documents it used to approve the Pfizer COVID vaccine.
Somehow, they could properly review these documents to approve a new vaccine in a matter of months, but it would tak ...[text shortened]... "
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-12-04/fda-wants-55-years-release-vaccine-approval-documents
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/dec/02/ask-politifact-does-cdc-lack-data-reinfection-peop/
@jimm619 saidI did. Dd you read this part?
---------READ---------
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/dec/02/ask-politifact-does-cdc-lack-data-reinfection-peop/
"That’s a separate question from a public records request that sought documentation of transmission of COVID-19 by unvaccinated people who are reinfected. The CDC said it does not collect that information."
Now, what have you learned?
@jimm619 saidThe same Zero Hedge that Fauci and Collins freaked out about when Fauci read it?
And?
''.......don't need a weatherman to know which the wind blows...''
Be my guest...Look up zero hedge
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2020/04/12/the-10-best-fact-checking-websites-for-2020
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fauci-emails-reveal-damage-control-scramble-after-zerohedge-spotlights-man-made-covid-19
Then when there were FOIA requests for those emails the one about the zero hedge article was redacted in it's entirety except for the headline of the email, "conspiracy gains momentum".
If zero hedge was so unimportant they sure thought it was worth their time for some reason we are not allowed to know. Why write about it if it meant nothing? More importantly, why redact the whole conversation? What is being hidden from us?
They sure let that Zero Hedge article get their undies in a bunch. They just could not ignore it. The people that redacted the whole conversation couldn't ignore it either. Why do you think that is?
@Metal-Brain
Yeah, just like TRUMP"S TAXES. What is hidden there TRUMP doesn't want us to know?
Seems to me that is a LOT more important than dissing Fauci who is a life long scientific leader.
But your goal is to screw up EVERYTHING American.
Good work, TRAITOR.
06 Dec 21
@sonhouse saidI once started a thread about Trump's taxes and how I thought he committed fraud on them. Do you remember that?
@Metal-Brain
Yeah, just like TRUMP"S TAXES. What is hidden there TRUMP doesn't want us to know?
Seems to me that is a LOT more important than dissing Fauci who is a life long scientific leader.
But your goal is to screw up EVERYTHING American.
Good work, TRAITOR.
06 Dec 21
From the link below:
"There has to be total transparency so scientists outside the government know exactly what is being approved. The context in which it's being approved and why it's being approved," Biden added.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-speak-vaccine-politics-center-stage-process/story?id=73047767
BUT the FDA does NOT want scientists outside the government to know exactly what was being approved. Is Biden objecting to the FDA dragging it's feet now? Nope. The FDA says it is not urgent. Does Biden think it is urgent?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@metal-brain saidUh, that they don't
I did. Dd you read this part?
"That’s a separate question from a public records request that sought documentation of transmission of COVID-19 by unvaccinated people who are reinfected. The CDC said it does not collect that information."
Now, what have you learned?
collect that information?