12 Aug '16 22:33>8 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderNo1Marauder has a long and very recent record of hurling lies and other abuse at me.
From your OP:
This sentence already has been widely criticized for being too lenient.
I suspect that the usual suspects here will be pleased with the sentence.
As it seems quite doubtful that a harsher sentence could do anything to help her "feel safe or recover" (unless you want to impose life in prison or death sentences for such crimes, peo any men on this forum, no matter how "sexist" in your view, would empathize with Mr. Wilkerson.
I note that No1Marauder recently concluded that I cannot be a non-white woman.
In particular, No1Marauder concluded that I must be white. After hurling his usual
insults and setting up 'strawmen' in attempting to distract attention, No1Marauder
claimed that he had OBSERVED from my 'prior posts' that I must be white.
But No1Marauder has been unable to cite any evidence from my posts that I must be white.
No1Marauder has been unable to quote any statement in which I described myself as white.
No1Marauder concluded that I must be white on account of his RACIAL PREJUDICE.
And I expect No1Marauder to keep hurling abuse and lies to attempt to cover up his wrongdoing.
"I suspect you are being disingenuous."
The pathological liar No1Marauder's opinion is worthless to me.
Has No1Marauder even bothered to read the victim's full statement?
It's obvious that, in contrast to No1Marauder, she regards the sentence as much too lenient.
I have empathy for the victim. Not yet knowing all the facts of the case, I cannot yet say
*if I agree* with her position that the man deserved the maximum sentence for sexual assault.
I note that the sexist No1Marauder prefers to aim his usual hate only at me rather than at
other white men (Sonhouse or Zahlanzi) who have criticized the sentence in harsher terms than I.
Even No1Marauder may feel that he has to appear more 'polite' toward other white men.
"It seems quite doubtful that a harsher sentence could do anything to help her 'feel safe ..."
No1Marauder (predictably) prefers to ignore what the victim has said about how she feels about it.
"Therefore, it's my contention that the maximum sentence would be most suitable.
I wouldn't have to worry about running into the rapist at CU football games or on campus
or even in New Mexico. The best reassurance would be know ... that the rapist cannot
physically get to me."
And No1Marauder's being extremely disingenuous (as usual) when he insinuates that
anyone (including the victim) has called for the man to be sentenced to life in prison.
Apparently, the victim would prefer that he be imprisoned long enough (perhaps several
years) for her to finish her education at Colorado University (after which she would leave).
"I seriously doubt that any men on this forum...would empathize with Mr Wilkerson."
Does the lawyer No1Marauder presume to speak for rape apologists such as Eladar,
Normbenign, or Quackquack (whom other white men have condemned as 'rape apologists' )?
Is No1Marauder's opinion of other sexist men based upon his considering the evidence (sarcasm)
in the same way that he used when he concluded that I cannot be a non-white woman?