Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Standard member Seitse
    Doug Stanhope
    07 May '16 15:26
    How do you feel about that?
  2. 07 May '16 15:35
    Originally posted by Seitse
    How do you feel about that?
    Since London is mostly muslim now I guess it was inevitable.
    Soon to be most of England, Mohammed has been the #1 name for newborn boys for several years.
    When that happens England will be a much better place, won't it?
  3. 07 May '16 15:43
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    Since London is mostly muslim now I guess it was inevitable.
    Soon to be most of England, Mohammed has been the #1 name for newborn boys for several years.
    When that happens England will be a much better place, won't it?
    heh one can always count on you to be idiotic
  4. 07 May '16 15:45
    Originally posted by Seitse
    How do you feel about that?
    Corruption ahead full steam backed up by the race card .
  5. 07 May '16 15:47
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    Since London is mostly muslim now I guess it was inevitable.
    Soon to be most of England, Mohammed has been the #1 name for newborn boys for several years.
    When that happens England will be a much better place, won't it?
    Since London is mostly muslim now


    Not factually true, or even close to being factually true. Muslims make up a minority in
    London and the UK as a whole.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_London

    Soon to be most of England, Mohammed has been the #1 name for newborn boys for several years.


    This doesn't mean what you think it means. It's a very popular name with a small minority of people.
    Outside that minority there is a huge plurality of different names that people choose.
    And while individually none might be as popular, the total number of names that are not Islamic based
    vastly outnumbers those that are.

    When that happens England will be a much better place, won't it?


    It's not going to happen, it's not even close to going to happen, and only ignorants suggest it's going to happen.

    What would be best, of course, would be the steady and peaceful growth of secularism and atheism,
    getting rid of all religions and their related extremists.
  6. 07 May '16 15:49
    Originally posted by Seitse
    How do you feel about that?
    All things equal I prefer an atheist.

    All things are not equal, so may the best candidate win.

    No idea if he was the best candidate, as I don't live in London and thus couldn't vote in that election
    I didn't pay a whole lot of attention.
  7. 07 May '16 15:49
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Since London is mostly muslim now


    Not factually true, or even close to being factually true. Muslims make up a minority in
    London and the UK as a whole.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_London

    Soon to be most of England, Mohammed has been the #1 name for newborn boys for several years.


    This doesn't m ...[text shortened]... l growth of secularism and atheism,
    getting rid of all religions and their related extremists.
    http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/dec/01/britain-most-popular-baby-name-muhammad
  8. 07 May '16 15:54
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/dec/01/britain-most-popular-baby-name-muhammad
    That might be relevant if I claimed that Muhammad wasn't the most popular name.

    Although I note the the users of that particular website may well not be representative of
    the population as a whole.

    However what I said was that "it doesn't mean what you think it means".

    It might be the most popular name, however that doesn't mean that a majority of babies are
    being given that name.

    There are thousands of different names [and more] and only a few out of the top 100 are
    common Islamic names. The majority [vast majority] of names given are non-Islamic
    names to non-Islamic babies.
  9. 07 May '16 16:00
    Originally posted by Seitse
    How do you feel about that?
    Mr Khan grew up on a local authority estate, he's from da hood, he wont forget his roots. Thank goodness they got rid of that useless dandy Johnson.
  10. 07 May '16 16:00
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Mr Khan grew up on a local authority estate, he's from da hood, he wont forget his roots. Thank goodness they got rid of that useless dandy Johnson.
    Not that he was running.
  11. Subscriber AThousandYoung
    Poor Filipov :,(
    07 May '16 16:03
    Has London ever had a Hindu mayor?
  12. 07 May '16 16:08
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Has London ever had a Hindu mayor?
    No, Hindu's aren't over running England.
    Muslims are.
  13. Subscriber AThousandYoung
    Poor Filipov :,(
    07 May '16 16:14
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    No, Hindu's aren't over running England.
    Muslims are.
    Where do you think England got most of her soldiers for WWI? Hindu Thuggees have a long history in London.
  14. 07 May '16 16:17
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Where do you think England got most of her soldiers for WWI? Hindu Thuggees have a long history in London.
    Most of England's soldiers in WWI were Hindu?
    You need to delete your post while you can it shows you up as an idiot.
  15. Subscriber AThousandYoung
    Poor Filipov :,(
    07 May '16 16:24 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    Most of England's soldiers in WWI were Hindu?
    You need to delete your post while you can it shows you up as an idiot.
    http://warandcolonies.com

    The conflict had special relevance to the Indian subcontinent as Britain, the ruling colonial power mobilised 1.5 million Indian soldiers during the war


    http://www.victorianlondon.org/crime/representations.htm