@Cliff-Mashburn saidThere's fraud where you look. The DOJ is only looking at those 2 states.
Is that why they are billions of dollars in debt? Newsome took a billion dollar surplus and is now 80 billion in the red. Doesn't sound very efficient to me.
@wildgrass saidHow do you know that?
There's fraud where you look. The DOJ is only looking at those 2 states.
By the way, red state Ohio has the same fraud claims being investigated right now, so that sort of kills your argument.
@mike69 saidTrue, can't reason with these people. Dunno why we try. They're as bad as the moon landing deniers. Wonder how many of them think the Apollo missions were faked?
This is the same person posting that thinks Trump with blood running down his head and people laying dead was a fake assignation attempt, I wouldn’t expect to much…
@Earl-of-Trumps saidgood for you. a lot of rightwingers here only go after blue states.
No, I'm not like that at all. If Trump gets convicted of wrongdoing, I respect the law more than Trump.
I'm a very objective person that way
@Cliff-Mashburn saidDoes that case involve Trump's doj?
How do you know that?
By the way, red state Ohio has the same fraud claims being investigated right now, so that sort of kills your argument.
@wildgrass saidNo, because the red state is looking into it all by themselves instead of covering it up like the blue ones do.
Does that case involve Trump's doj?
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThen my point still stands. There's undoubtedly more corruption in Texas than in Minnesota but those crimes are ignored because there's no Democrats running for president in that state.
No, because the red state is looking into it all by themselves instead of covering it up like the blue ones do.
@wildgrass saidUndoubtedly more corruption in Texas than Minnesota? Once again...HOW TF would you know that?
Then my point still stands. There's undoubtedly more corruption in Texas than in Minnesota but those crimes are ignored because there's no Democrats running for president in that state.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidBecause the feds send more money there.
Undoubtedly more corruption in Texas than Minnesota? Once again...HOW TF would you know that?
@wildgrass saidI just checked......Texas has six times the population of Minnesota and on a per capita basis it receives less federal funding than Minnesota.
Because the feds send more money there.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidNo it doesn't receive less funding
I just checked......Texas has six times the population of Minnesota and on a per capita basis it receives less federal funding than Minnesota.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidWhy should Texas receive any federal funding? They keep threatening to secede!
I just checked......Texas has six times the population of Minnesota and on a per capita basis it receives less federal funding than Minnesota.