Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 06 Mar '11 21:23
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glory_%28satellite%29
  2. 06 Mar '11 21:24
    anyone want to claim the govt doesn't waste money?
  3. Donation rwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    06 Mar '11 21:55
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    anyone want to claim the govt doesn't waste money?
    All bureaucracies waste money, both public and private.
  4. 06 Mar '11 22:30
    Originally posted by zeeblebot
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glory_%28satellite%29
    How is this related to reaching out to Muslims?
  5. 06 Mar '11 22:39
    "The Taurus XL rocket's first three stages functioned as planned, but the nose cone (also known as the payload fairing) failed to separate 2 minutes 58 seconds after the launch.[6] The nose cone covers and protects the satellite during launch and ascent, and is designed to separate and fall away shortly after the launch. Due to the failure of the nose cone to separate, the rocket remained too heavy to reach the correct orbit."

    Your use of "blows $500M" seems to imply that they simply wasted the money, not that there had been a mechanical failure that had caused it. In essence, you are saying that NASA is wasteful unless everything they do is done perfectly. What they do is expensive, so if there is a failure, there is going to be a big ticket attached to it.

    So, what, exactly, is your point?
  6. 07 Mar '11 02:49 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by CliffLandin
    [i]"The Taurus XL rocket's first three stages functioned as planned, but the nose cone (also known as the payload fairing) failed to separate 2 minutes 58 seconds after the launch.[6] The nose cone covers and protects the satellite during launch and ascent, and is designed to separate and fall away shortly after the launch. Due to the failure of the nose ure, there is going to be a big ticket attached to it.

    So, what, exactly, is your point?
    [/i]it's the second consecutive launch failure caused by a fairing failure on Orbital's launch vehicle. this was the first use of the vehicle after a 2-year moratorium following the first fairing failure.

    thus the title, "NASA blows $500M testing Orbital's launch vehicle".