Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    22 Jan '17 00:31 / 1 edit
    http://mashable.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-inauguration-crowds/#UgnU41yC7kqP

    Comparing the size of the crowd on Coronation Day, oops, sorry, I meant Inauguration Day on Friday versus the crowd for the Women's March On Washington today.
  2. 22 Jan '17 00:32
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    http://mashable.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-inauguration-crowds/#UgnU41yC7kqP

    Comparing the size of the crowd on Coronation Day, oops, sorry, I meant Inauguration Day versus the crowd for the Women's March On Washington.
    Comparing the votes in the voting booth would be more meaningful.
  3. 22 Jan '17 00:35 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by divegeester to Suzianne
    Comparing the votes in the voting booth would be more meaningful.
    Hillary Clinton received almost three million more votes than Donald Trump in the 2016 US Presidential election.
    How meaningful is that?
  4. 22 Jan '17 00:38
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    Hillary Clinton received almost three million more votes than Donald Trump in the 2016 US Presidential election.
    How meaningful is that?
    Will you please stop stroking Suzianne?
    It is sexy to imagine you two together, but not relevant in this forum.
  5. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    22 Jan '17 00:39
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    Hillary Clinton received almost three million more votes than Donald Trump in the 2016 US Presidential election.
    How meaningful is that?
    To really drive the point home, they should take a picture of those three million people who fell into one (or more) of these groups:
    • Illegal alien
    • Already voted
    • Dead
  6. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    22 Jan '17 00:39
    Originally posted by chaney3
    Will you please stop stroking Suzianne?
    It is sexy to imagine you two together, but not relevant in this forum.
    That's one way to cause mass vomiting.
  7. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    22 Jan '17 00:40
    Originally posted by divegeester
    Comparing the votes in the voting booth would be more meaningful.
    There are voting booths at the Women's March? Who knew?










    And no, comparing votes of people who actually got to vote means nothing, since many were prevented from voting by Republican state governments. Try comparing the millions of provisional ballots that never got counted. Try comparing ALL of the votes instead of just those they wanted to count. Better yet, let everyone who wanted to vote actually vote. The crime of this election was silencing a large number of the People. Even the protections of the US Constitution failed them.
  8. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    22 Jan '17 00:43 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by FreakyKBH
    To really drive the point home, they should take a picture of those three million people who fell into one (or more) of these groups:
    • Illegal alien
    • Already voted
    • Dead
    "Voter fraud" is as much a figment of your imagination as "The Moon Landings Were Faked", "9/11 Was An Inside Job", and "The Earth Is Flat".

    Keep those hits coming!

    Watch something besides Fox News, for once.
  9. 22 Jan '17 00:45
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    There are voting booths at the Women's March? Who knew?










    And no, comparing votes of people who actually got to vote means nothing, since many were prevented from voting by Republican state governments. Try comparing the millions of provisional ballots that never got counted. Try comparing ALL of the votes instead of just those they wa ...[text shortened]... ilencing a large number of the People. Even the protections of the US Constitution failed them.
    Fraud.
    Women's rights are a joke.
    Do men have 'men's rights'?
    No.
  10. 22 Jan '17 00:47 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by chaney3
    Will you please stop stroking Suzianne?
    It is sexy to imagine you two together, but not relevant in this forum.
    I know some of the points that Suzianne likes.

    https://thinkprogress.org/2016-a-case-study-in-voter-suppression-258b5f90ddcd#.gf2l2nicm

    "Republicans were wildly successful at suppressing voters in 2016:
    Three GOP-controlled states demonstrate the effectiveness of disenfranchising the opposition."
  11. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    22 Jan '17 00:48
    Originally posted by chaney3
    Fraud.
    Women's rights are a joke.
    Do men have 'men's rights'?
    No.
    Every single day is "Men's Rights Day".

    Wake up.
  12. 22 Jan '17 00:50
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    I know some of the points that Suzianne likes.
    Admit that women control sex, and we will be fine.
  13. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    22 Jan '17 00:51
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    I know some of the points that Suzianne likes.
    I got to wear my "Pussyhat" today at the Women's March here in Phoenix, so it's all good.
  14. 22 Jan '17 00:52
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Every single day is "Men's Rights Day".

    Wake up.
    I disagree.
    Women use their p#ssy to control men.
    It's a fact!!
  15. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    22 Jan '17 00:52 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    "Voter fraud" is as much a figment of your imagination as "The Moon Landings Were Faked", "9/11 Was An Inside Job", and "The Earth Is Flat".

    Watch something besides Fox News, for God's sake.
    Voter fraud is part of that "Fake News" shtick, is it?
    You get that from... what source, exactly?
    The entirety of MSM is, pardon the male-centered expression, tainted.
    I don't subscribe to any of them, including Fox, even if Fox is a few inches closer to some of the truth than others.
    The minute any of them start delving into the malfeasance which has been in operation since, well, ever and more glaringly manifested since November 1963, they might be worth listening to.
    Of course, as soon as they do, there will be the faithful stupid such as yourself lining up to call them conspiracy kooks... without even a casual review of the evidence.

    Case in point: voter fraud.
    Clear and convincing evidence has existed since, again, ever, but l'il naysayer Suzianne can authoritatively and confidently poo-poo such realities with the dismissive wave of her hand.
    Ooh, but now Trump was in cahoots with the Ruskies to hack the election???
    Why, of COURSE there's voter fraud!
    It's rampant!
    We're silly with the stuff!


    Dream on, toots.