Go back
Peace

Peace

Debates

S

Joined
09 May 06
Moves
361
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Is the way to achieve peace through ...

Effort
Education
Understanding
Negotiation
Compromise
Acceptance
Forgiving
Patience ?

Can you provide an alternative list ?

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
Is the way to achieve peace through ...

Effort
Education
Understanding
Negotiation
Compromise
Acceptance
Forgiving
Patience ?

Can you provide an alternative list ?
Kill everybody else

S

Joined
09 May 06
Moves
361
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Kill everybody else
Is that feasible ?

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Agitate, Educate, Organise.

7

Jew.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
3938
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

l
Kara Thrace &

her special destiny

Joined
24 Apr 06
Moves
20456
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Agitate, Educate, Organise.
Then re-educate and exterminate right mike?

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lordhighgus
Then re-educate and exterminate right mike?
Well, education should be ongoing, but I'm a socialist, not a dalek, so extermination isn't a useful means of achieving peace, IMO.

S

Joined
09 May 06
Moves
361
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Agitate, Educate, Organise.
Wouldn't the agitation already have happened and does organisation happen between the parties or is it one sided ?

s
Don't Like It Leave

Walking the earth.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
50664
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
Wouldn't the agitation already have happened and does organisation happen between the parties or is it one sided ?
They're all really ongoing processes, which everyone interested in peace should be doing.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that it is a political question - the way to progress to peace is a political process.

You need to agitate to get people interested in the issue, you need to educate people so that they understand the issue and you need to organise politically to change things as you want.

s
Don't Like It Leave

Walking the earth.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
50664
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
But in your case, the more people understand your issues, the more they're going to like what the other guy's saying.
As you ably demonstrate, some people will spend more time on the education part than others.

S

Joined
09 May 06
Moves
361
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
They're all really ongoing processes, which everyone interested in peace should be doing.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that it is a political question - the way to progress to peace is a political process.

You need to agitate to get people interested in the issue, you need to educate people so that they understand the issue and you need to organise politically to change things as you want.
But that sounds like one sided internal politics rather than a negotiation, etc between the disputing parties ?

j

CA, USA

Joined
06 Dec 02
Moves
1182
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

The way to achive peace can be found on several internet forums.
All you have to do is ...

Hate on America and Christians as often as possible.

Claim the high ground: Point out continually how tolerant and compassionate you are .. and how Americans/Christians are cruel and indifferent.

Claim that "there is no violence" and that God is a fools dream. Cite your Prof. as proof.

Do everything you can to undermine the only Country that might save your sorry ass (again)

Stand behind Hezbollah and Hamas in there quest for peaceful co-existance.

Lay down your arms and follow STANKBO .. the voice of reason.

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
27 Jul 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
But that sounds like one sided internal politics rather than a negotiation, etc between the disputing parties ?
It is indeed internal politics, but if this is going on within each party to a conflict, then they are both more likely to adopt non-violent means to resolve the conflict.

What I'm saying is that you need to have the representatives of each party prepared to accept a peaceful solution, which you achieve by political means.

If you haven't got this, you have representatives who consider violent means a first option for conflict resolution. In such cases, no amount of negotiation etc etc will matter.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.