Originally posted by Sambo69They're all really ongoing processes, which everyone interested in peace should be doing.
Wouldn't the agitation already have happened and does organisation happen between the parties or is it one sided ?
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it is a political question - the way to progress to peace is a political process.
You need to agitate to get people interested in the issue, you need to educate people so that they understand the issue and you need to organise politically to change things as you want.
Originally posted by RedmikeBut that sounds like one sided internal politics rather than a negotiation, etc between the disputing parties ?
They're all really ongoing processes, which everyone interested in peace should be doing.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it is a political question - the way to progress to peace is a political process.
You need to agitate to get people interested in the issue, you need to educate people so that they understand the issue and you need to organise politically to change things as you want.
The way to achive peace can be found on several internet forums.
All you have to do is ...
Hate on America and Christians as often as possible.
Claim the high ground: Point out continually how tolerant and compassionate you are .. and how Americans/Christians are cruel and indifferent.
Claim that "there is no violence" and that God is a fools dream. Cite your Prof. as proof.
Do everything you can to undermine the only Country that might save your sorry ass (again)
Stand behind Hezbollah and Hamas in there quest for peaceful co-existance.
Lay down your arms and follow STANKBO .. the voice of reason.
Originally posted by Sambo69It is indeed internal politics, but if this is going on within each party to a conflict, then they are both more likely to adopt non-violent means to resolve the conflict.
But that sounds like one sided internal politics rather than a negotiation, etc between the disputing parties ?
What I'm saying is that you need to have the representatives of each party prepared to accept a peaceful solution, which you achieve by political means.
If you haven't got this, you have representatives who consider violent means a first option for conflict resolution. In such cases, no amount of negotiation etc etc will matter.