Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 27 Nov '16 01:54
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
  2. Standard member sh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    27 Nov '16 02:04
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking-explain-the-election-results/
  3. Subscriber KingDavid403
    King David
    27 Nov '16 02:11
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
    If there was no voting fraud, then the Dump and his supporters have nothing to worry about.
  4. 27 Nov '16 02:38 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by sh76
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking-explain-the-election-results/
    Do you agree that someone with less than 5 percent of the vote should not be allowed to have a recount?

    Looks like the work of the never Trump Republicans and the Democrats.
  5. 27 Nov '16 02:40
    Originally posted by KingDavid403
    If there was no voting fraud, then the Dump and his supporters have nothing to worry about.
    Libtard logic. Can't have recount fraud.
  6. Standard member checkbaiter
    By God's Grace
    27 Nov '16 03:29
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
    To cause more division...
  7. 27 Nov '16 03:45
    Just to be clear it isn't the recount that I believe is wrong, but the fact that Hillary is using a surrogate.
  8. 27 Nov '16 04:30
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
    She is filling her coffers w/disgruntled hillary voters money. She raking in way more money than the recounts cost. Greed. Plain and simple.
  9. 27 Nov '16 04:57
    Originally posted by kquinn909
    She is filling her coffers w/disgruntled hillary voters money. She raking in way more money than the recounts cost. Greed. Plain and simple.
    There is no possible way she won so why does she get to demand a recount?
  10. Standard member shavixmir
    Guppy poo
    27 Nov '16 07:08
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
    Considering who the Americans voted fornas president, I presume your question is rhetorical.
  11. 27 Nov '16 07:47
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?

    Is it because people think Americans are too stupid to see this is an obvious Hillary using a stooge to do her dirty work?

    Who know, maybe Americans are that stupid.
    Because it makes Jill Stein and the Greens heroes for the left, hoping they can pry a few votes off the next time. And if it does reverse the results, they'll REALLY be viewed as heroes.

    In the meantime, Trump has apparently already lost 5000 imaginary votes before the recount even begins. Not saying there was deliberate cheating in the absence of facts, but you check the links and the figures are correct. WTF?

    http://www.palmerreport.com/news/ahead-of-recount-wisconsin-has-already-wiped-out-5000-phony-votes-for-donald-trump/234/
  12. 27 Nov '16 07:48
    Originally posted by Eladar
    There is no possible way she won so why does she get to demand a recount?
    Any candidate on the ballot can demand a recount in most states - if they're willing to pay the costs.
  13. 27 Nov '16 08:19
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Why would someone who has absolutely no chance of winning demand a recount?
    Its not you paying for it. What are you worried about?
  14. 27 Nov '16 12:24
    Originally posted by Kunsoo
    Any candidate on the ballot can demand a recount in most states - if they're willing to pay the costs.
    So the system has built in sock puppets. Nice
  15. 27 Nov '16 12:26
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Its not you paying for it. What are you worried about?
    Hillary is paying for it. I just want the truth to be known and force Hillary to do her own hypocritical dirty work.