20 May '17 08:13>
Originally posted by vivifyMy apologies, I misread it.
Who said anything about interviewing them? I didn't.
Still you post still doesn't make a whole lot of sense. You were supposedly giving an example of presenting 'both sides' to a story and 'balancing out the facts' but then subsequently claimed that there was only one fact and despite presenting the views you were reporting on, you would declare them wrong and that there was no bias in doing so. The whole post doesn't seem to address what you were responding to at all.
You apparently need to Google the word "bias", since you apparently don't know what it means. This is the second time you need it explained to you that simply stating something factually accurate isn't bias, because there's no unfairness in the act.
Honestly. This must be how world leaders feel when they explain things to Trump.
And, yet another dodge.