Go back
should hillary clinton be jailed…

should hillary clinton be jailed…

Debates


… for violating election laws when she used dnc money to create the (false) steele dossier?


@Mott-The-Hoople

She should have been arrested in 2016, but the crooked FBI let her go. She was the Teflon Donna her whole career


@Earl-of-Trumps said
@Mott-The-Hoople

She should have been arrested in 2016, but the crooked FBI let her go. She was the Teflon Donna her whole career
Not ONE lily-livered lib will own up to this very simple uncontested fact. They simply say that she is one of us, so she gets a pass. What an above-board group of like-losers.


@Mott-The-Hoople said
… for violating election laws when she used dnc money to create the (false) steele dossier?
She's powerless now but if she were in jail it'd give a lot more meat for the libbies to prosecute trump 100 more times.

2 edits

Because trump has done what Hillary did 100 times over.

Foot soldiers with zero security clearance were xeroxing classified documents and storing them on flash drives so the FBI couldn't take them back.

But her email.
Yes. Put shrillary in prison.


@AverageJoe1 said
Not ONE lily-livered lib will own up to this very simple uncontested fact. They simply say that she is one of us, so she gets a pass. What an above-board group of like-losers.
I think everyone (even libbies) on this forum has said prosecute if ample evidence exists that crimes were committed.

A shame really. We all agree on this but it's still a debate topic.


@wildgrass said
Because trump has done what Hillary did 100 times over.

Foot soldiers with zero security clearance were xeroxing classified documents and storing them on flash drives so the FBI couldn't take them back.

But her email.
Yes. Put shrillary in prison.
Can you prove this? or did you just make it up 🙄


@wildgrass said
Because trump has done what Hillary did 100 times over.

Foot soldiers with zero security clearance were xeroxing classified documents and storing them on flash drives so the FBI couldn't take them back.

But her email.
Yes. Put shrillary in prison.
are you suggesting it’s ok to delete emails that were under congressional subpoena?


@Mott-The-Hoople said
are you suggesting it’s ok to delete emails that were under congressional subpoena?
No. I wrote.that she should be prosecuted.


@wildgrass said
No. I wrote.that she should be prosecuted.
did you write “but her emails”

what did you mean by that?


@Mott-The-Hoople said
did you write “but her emails”

what did you mean by that?
She deleted some emails while she was secretary of state. Lock her up.

We're on the same team. The whole forum is.


@wildgrass said
She deleted some emails while she was secretary of state. Lock her up.

We're on the same team. The whole forum is.
I'm sure you meant to say, "Look her up", yeah?


@Mott-The-Hoople said
did you write “but her emails”

what did you mean by that?
It's "Butter Emails". Learn the meme.


@wildgrass said
I think everyone (even libbies) on this forum has said prosecute if ample evidence exists that crimes were committed.

A shame really. We all agree on this but it's still a debate topic.
And that's a mighty big damned "if".

1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople said
… for violating election laws when she used dnc money to create the (false) steele dossier?
There is no proof that the events in the dossier did not happen.

If you want to give your mafia-like boss a pass on criminal activity, that's one thing. Don't drag the rest of us into your fantasy.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.